It is obvious that Roberts’s true opinion of the law was that it was unconstitutional, just as stated in the conservatives’ dissent. It is equally obvious that the vain, cowardly Roberts changed his vote, true opinion notwithstanding, to enhance his legacy and/or to protect The Court As An Institution (As Liberals See It).
He violated his oath and should be treated as such.
>He violated his oath and should be treated as such.<
.
Sheesh. Are you proposing that American politicians be held accountable for their actions?
How quaint.