It's interesting to note that this article has two headlines, the headline for the article's continuation on page 2 column 3 is: ICKES NAMED TO OIL DICTATORSHIP
This is history that needs to be remembered. I'm glad to dig it out and put it on display.
FDR's 11 Dictators are as follows:
(1) Censorship Dictator (Dictator of Censorship)
(2) Information Dictator (Dictator of Information)
(3) Economic Dictator
(4) Food Dictator
(5) Manpower Dictator
(6) Oil Dictator
(7) Price Dictator
(8) Production Dictator
(9) Rubber Dictator
(10) Shipping Dictator
(11) Transportation Dictator
The Wikipedia page for Executive Branch Czars unsurprisingly omits this fact.
To: Silentgypsy; skinkinthegrass; RichardMoore; Little Ray; Madame Dufarge; Eye of Newt; AdvisorB; ...
If anybody wants on/off the revolutionary progressivism ping list, send me a message
Progressives do not want to discuss their own history. I want to discuss their history.
Summary: I was asked the other day about executive level Czars, and I tried explaining that they weren't originally called that. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the first to do this, and he called his appointments dictators.
2 posted on
07/11/2012 1:17:24 PM PDT by
ProgressingAmerica
(What's the best way to reach a you tube generation? Put it on you tube!)
To: ProgressingAmerica
Actually, the article says Ickes would be a virtual dictator, not that this was his title.
If you have any reference that shows these guys actually carried the title Dictator, I’d like to see it.
BTW, this was entirely justified at such a time, and necessary to win the war. The problem is that liberals are enthralled with the power (properly) given such guys during wartime and want to extend it into peace and make it permanent. With them in charge, of course.
To: ProgressingAmerica
a great cartoon from 1934 Ickes is on the wagon. read more here: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/06/14/trib-reruns-1934-cartoon-planned-economy-or-planned-destruction
To: ProgressingAmerica
These 'dictators' had a mixed record and in the end Roosevelt had to turn to business tychoons to get the USA on a productive footing. An excellent book on this subject is
"FREEDOM'S FORGE", portraying GM's William Knudsen and steel magnate Henry J. Kaiser in their "dollar-a-year" roles as production czars!
14 posted on
07/11/2012 2:07:54 PM PDT by
SES1066
(Government is NOT the reason for my existence!)
To: ProgressingAmerica
Looks like the Clinton people are being put into place.
15 posted on
07/11/2012 2:12:13 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: ProgressingAmerica; Homer_J_Simpson; LucyT; TheOldLady; Danae; Ladysforest; ml/nj; ...
It's pretty obvious that some people at the Obama White House have studied the history of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Administration quite extensively and are emulating it whenever feasible. So we are today reliving in many ways the tyrannical government actions that occurred then, with slight changes in the government vocabulary, perhaps, like Obama’s “czars” instead of Roosevelt's “dictators.”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson