Posted on 07/12/2012 8:24:03 PM PDT by tcg
I must vote to discharge my duty as a faithful Catholic citizen.
“Keith, your duty as a “faithful Catholic citizen” includes not aiding and abetting evil, whether the “O” or “R” variety.”
~ ~ ~
Exactly. Your duty is to God first. Voting for these
two pro-aborts, pro-sodomites, both non-Christians, is
a grave sin. There is no lessor of two evils this time.
Well, maybe “R” is worse, he pretends to be Christian and for life. But, remember Illinois, Obama is Herod. “Write in” a godly man instead.
Give ... Me.. a ... Break
IIRC it was stated that Nixon lost to Kennedy by 1 vote per precinct.
Your non-vote, discouraging sentiments, along with others of similar mind could swing the election.
Is that what you want? Another 4 yrs. of this debacle?
I’d like to hear from the 800 pound elephant in the room. Jim Robinson, care to speak up?
Don’t you think JR has better things to do than to get involved when every tattle tale runs and screams to him.
Its ridiculous already.
Friggin supposed “adults” acting like 6 y/o running to mommy all the time.
I just find it strange that last year there was a banner every day on this site declaring Romney a liar, cheat, etc. and that no one should support him nor would this site support him.
Now that Romney is the republican candidate, there is no banner, and I have not seen (or I missed) a declarative statement from JR.
I don’t think one has to support him to not slander and lie about him, such as the “father of gay marriage” b.s.
I don’t one has to be a big support to realize the most important objective is to remove the Obama regime from power - and act in ways that further that objective.
Whatever you think about Romney, he is NOT the 'father of gay marriage'. That was the brainchild of homosexual activists who were apparently in cahoots with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of MA. They worked together to do their thing before the voters had the chance to vote on a Marriage Amendment to the Constitution. What Romney failed to do was give the order to the Clerks not to follow the law. It isn't clear if the Clerks could have been held personally, legally liable, if they'd refused.
I don't remember government funding of abortion as part of the original Romneycare in MA. If that is in place, it could very well have been voted on by the Democrat legislature. They have been fiddling with Romneycare ever since it went into effect. and if they wanted it, there was nothing Romney could do. They overrode several of his vetos of the changes they made in the health care program when he first proposed it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.