This edict ought to be challenged immediately and headed to the Supreme Court, for what that’s worth under Benedict Roberts.
HEY! Sobber of the House Boehner! Where are you?
Send the Sergeant of Arms of the US House over to the Sebelius-Shed to hand deliver a cease and desist order!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BTW, while you are at it, hand deliver one to the Mad Holder at the Justice Dept. also.
she appears to be a heavy smoker...something she has in common with Hussein???
The lawless tyrannical Obama regime must be brought down!
Congress and/or SCOTUS need to stand up to this tyranny. This is not a flippin’ dictatorship.
This is right out of Cloward and Piven, to overwhelm the system. Only, it is the government doing it.
Tick, tick, tick...
Why not? This administration has done this for four years almost. A law was written to curb welfare abuses. We have an election coming up. Why not skirt the law to gain some welfare voters? Seems right for an administration that makes its own rules as they go. Seems a federal judge told them not to initiate the health care law and Obama went ahead with it anyway. Why, because nobody stopped him. In order for the laws to be upheld, it is necessary for somebody to say ‘hey wait a minute, that’s not legal’. There is nobody in Washington with the guts to do that. Go ahead Kathleen. See if anybody will stop you.
BFLR
There was no “Clinton Welfare Reform” plan and there is no waiver in the bill passesd by the republican Congress.
The Dems are going all out to buy this election.
What are we waiting for??
Where in the hell is Congress on this? Boehner? Boehner!!?? McConnell!!??
Didn’t Obama say yesterday that his biggest mistake was spending too much time getting his policies perfect and not enough time explanining them.
Now they’re again making a controversial and dubiously legal policy without offering a bit of explanation.
Didn’t Obama say yesterday that his biggest mistake was spending too much time getting his policies perfect and not enough time explanining them.
Now they’re again making a controversial and dubiously legal policy without offering a bit of explanation.