Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/13/2012 2:29:38 PM PDT by finnsheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: finnsheep
That being said, please be assured that I value your input and will keep our shared concerns in mind should the Senate undertake the ratification process for UNCLOS.

Sorry, he does not say he will vote against LOST. He says he will keep your concerns in mind. He needs to make a stronger statement on how he will vote. Otherwise, he cannot be trusted.

2 posted on 07/13/2012 2:40:31 PM PDT by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: finnsheep

LOST is as bad as it was 30 years ago. These equivocating senators are as bad as LOST.


4 posted on 07/13/2012 3:04:54 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: finnsheep

Hmmm.....sounds somewhat vague. He says he opposes it’s ratification but never commits to a “NO” vote.

This from the RINO who voiced support for Sotomayor & the repeal of DADT.

Yeah, I’d say he can’t be trusted.


8 posted on 07/13/2012 3:50:37 PM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: finnsheep

How can any Senator vote for LOST and think the ChiComs will abide by it? Look what those bass-turds are trying to do in the South China sea.


9 posted on 07/13/2012 3:53:16 PM PDT by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson