Did you mean to direct your comment to me?
I don't dispute Freeh's opinions in his report.
I was suspicious of Freeh to begin with, because of his history of reaching conclusions first and then writing the report (for example, personally naming Richard Jewell as the Olympic Centennial Park bomber, or his whitewashed report on Waco and the Branch Davidian compound).
Also, I wouldn't be stunned if, hidden behind Freeh's criticism of the BOT, he left out details devastating to his employer, the BOT, regarding that BOT members may have known since 1998. I only have to think of TWA 800, Vince Foster, Waco, and other reports he's handled to know I don't trust him to wait to draw conclusions until he's done his research.
With respect to Paterno, Spanier, Schultz, and Curley, I think Freeh told us as much as he could. Remember than he was limited in what he could disclose based on what the AG and other prosecutors still working on this case would permit him to disclose.
I don't think we really disagree on much.