Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: duffee

I was really hoping someone would explain how this works.


4 posted on 07/13/2012 8:43:55 PM PDT by WKB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: WKB

If the woman has complications following the dastardly work of the unborn-baby butcher, Mississippi wants said U.B.B. to admit her to a hospital, not call an ambulance to send her to an emergency room. However, U.B.B.’s are considered the scum of medicine (even compared to coroners, who never have to worry about killing who they examine) and hospitals don’t want to grant them privileges.

This silly judge is trying to have it both ways. I hope an appeal forces his hand.


5 posted on 07/13/2012 8:48:27 PM PDT by raccoonnookkeeper (I keep raccoons in a nook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: WKB

“The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled states can’t place undue burdens on, or substantial obstacles to, women seeking abortions.”

This is the problem. I don’t like the ruling, but the judge is adhering to federal law.

It is incumbent on the the state of Mississippi to prove they aren’t violating federal law.

So, the question is...........when did it become a crime for states to pass their own laws?

Why is a federal judge involved, instead of the state court?

There’s the rub.


6 posted on 07/13/2012 11:36:55 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (This hobbit is looking for her pitchfork...God help the GOP if I find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson