If a person read all of the reports, and used their brain, then we knew this without an FBI finding.
Good thing for George apparently no on wanted to screw him over. It would only take one person who didn’t like him to tell the FBI he once told a black joke and he would be charged with a ‘hate’ crime. Our modern Inquisitors would burn him at the stake for being a heretic against Black Worship. Better bow to your gods, whitey! And that means if your gods are beating and killing you, don’t even think about defending yourself, you’re just another blood sacrifice.
[[If a person read all of the reports, and used their brain, then we knew this without an FBI finding]]
But our dear leader had to brign i nthe FBI to make it appear that he was cocnerned abotu the truth when infact, it was nothign more than a ply to fomment/encourage more racism agaisnt zimmerman and white folks- My guess is that EITHER the FBI encouraged the woman to embellish her claims at the same tiem that the FBI came otu witrh their ‘no racial bias’ ‘finding’ i norder to keep the racial hatred mantra movign ahead, OR that our dear leader pressured the judsge to release the woman’s claims knowing full well that to do so would convict george even before the trial took place and the claim determiend false!
there is NO justice i nthis case- as incle chip has pouinted out- the judge had absoplutely NO judicial reason to release that steement, but he did anyways- Why? If He’s such a ‘by the book’ judge, then he had NO business releasing that statement NOR did he have any business bringign george back to prison for supposedly lying about finances when it was the judge HIMSELF who told gerorg’es wife that it wasn’t necessary for her to call the brother in law to find out how much was in the paypal account- The judge’s descision NOT to call releived mr’s zim of hetr boligation to say ANYTHING abotu the money- the burden to find out was now sqaurekly on the court’s shoudlers because gthe judge said what he did- IF he wanted to know how much money was i nthe accouint he had the opportunity to find out by allowing her to call the brother in law- He refused to allow that to takep lace- so again- she now had NO obligation to say ANYTHING abotu the funds even if she did infacvt knowhow much was in there- which there is evidence to suggest that she did not
BTW- the judge is ON TAPE telling her no it wasn’t necessary to call brotherinlaw- This judge can claim he is a ‘by the book’ jusge all he likes- He’s LYING- either that or he’s not aware of the FACT that he doesn’t ifnact go by the book- but I suspect he knows he doesn’t and as such he should be relieved of his dutiesw immediately because is is becoming alrmingly evident that george zimmerman will NOT EVER get a fair trial under him- this last boneheaded move by the judge proves thgis!