[txrangerette]

Romney didn’t work longer at Bain than he said.

He stopped working at Bain when he said, yet his name was on Bain SEC filings after that. WHY?

Because he owned the company...ie, had controlling interest via his shareholdings.

Are you capable of understanding the difference between working at a company vs holding controlling interest in the company?

I would think/hope you are capable of that.

I don’t accept Obama’s premise about Romney and Bain.

It is a lie.

[Mr. K]

well of course it is a lie- but the sheeple can be fooled by it

but my point remains, is that all he’s got?

The people are not going to be shouting down Romney over this... most wont even care. And Obama blew $100million on it?

[superloser]

He stopped working at Bain when he said, yet his name was on Bain SEC filings after that. WHY?
Because he owned the company...ie, had controlling interest via his shareholdings.

Also -- the Law requires that a Corporation have a CEO. The shareholders elect the CEO. If one person holds all the shares, guess who the CEO is?

0bama figures that Americans are too stupid to know this.