Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: repentant_pundit
But it wouldn't be a law. I'm talking about a private agreement among all broadcast media to boycott these ads. If the boycott were upheld properly, Zero (or the guy running for county dogcatcher) could send negative attack ads to the broadcasters until they were blue in the face--they just wouldn't be aired!
24 posted on 07/17/2012 6:45:04 AM PDT by teflon9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: teflon9
But it wouldn't be a law. I'm talking about a private agreement among all broadcast media to boycott these ads.

OK, fair enough. I'm all for private agreements.

But if I had a media company, a website perhaps, I'd not join the coalition of "all" broadcast media.

This is a large nation; many others would refuse to join such a coalition to boycott "negative" ads.

I, and many others, would gladly accept ads that tell the truth about someone like 0bamao.

And the truth might just be percieved as negative toward him !

25 posted on 07/17/2012 7:37:56 AM PDT by repentant_pundit (Sammy's your uncle, but he behaves like a spoiled rotten kid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson