Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Judge Imposes Racial Quota on FDNY, Responding to Minorities Who Failed Entrance Exams
CNS ^ | 7/16/2012

Posted on 07/16/2012 7:30:42 PM PDT by Altura Ct.

A federal judge is ordering the New York City Fire Department to implement racial quotas to address grievances from minorities who failed entrance exams.

On July 5 in Brooklyn, Nicholas G. Garaufis, a Clinton-appointed judge for the Eastern District of New York, issued a ruling that requires two of every five newly hired fireman to be black and one of every five, Hispanic -- until the department has fulfilled the court-ordered quota of 186 black and 107 Hispanic hires.

The ruling allows back pay -- totaling an estimated $128.7 million -- for minorities who failed written tests.

The court order is a response to a lawsuit alleging that two placement exams (Written Exams 7029 or 2043) for the FDNY were discriminatory against blacks and Hispanics, because fewer minorities passed the exam than whites. (See copies of the exams here.)

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division is responsible for prosecuting cases under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The DOJ claims the written exams had an “unlawful disparate impact,” causing fewer minorities to be hired.

“Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits not only intentional discrimination, but also employment practices that appear to be fair in form but are discriminatory in operation,” the Department states in a fact sheet on the FDNY case. “A facially neutral employment practice, such as a written examination, that disproportionately excludes individuals from employment opportunities on the basis of their membership in a protected group, such as a particular race or national origin, and cannot be shown to be related to job performance, violates Title VII.”

Judge Garanufis ruled that any black or Hispanic individual who failed either written exam with a score of 25 out of 100 or higher is eligible to receive place on the priority hiring list as well as damages, including “non-economic damages.”

Non-economic damages are intended to compensate for the “lost intangible benefits of being a firefighter.” The intangible benefits include “prestige, job satisfaction, camaraderie, unique excitement, enjoyment of flexible scheduling, unusual employment stability, feeling of security derived from retiring with a full pension and lifetime medical benefits, and the potential for career advancement.”

All new hires must pass an updated test—Exam 2000—as long as it is found to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the ruling states.

Further, Judge Garanufis ruled that minorities who were not hired because they failed the entrance exams must be paid a “retroactively higher salary” and receive “retroactive seniority” once they are hired through the new quota system. Retroactive seniority affects accrual of vacation and sick leave, among other benefits.

The Bush Justice Department filed suit against the FDNY in May 2007, challenging the exams that were first administered in 1999 and 2002. In July 2009, Judge Garaufis ruled that New York City had violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and then in 2010 he found the city liable for “intentional discrimination against black applicants,” according to the DOJ.

In a previous ruling, Judge Garaufis accused the FDNY of being a “bastion of white male privilege.”

"While the City's other uniformed services and fire departments across the country have changed to reflect the communities they serve, employment as a New York City firefighter -- arguably 'the best job in the world' -- has remained a stubborn bastion of white male privilege," Garaufis wrote in October 2011.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: GOPJ
putting the disinterested students and gang bangers directly into union apprenticeships

Yep, they'll fit right in. This is 0bama's "Civilian Army".

61 posted on 07/17/2012 5:20:08 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

FDNY Entrance Exam:
1) How would you describe your race?
If “African-American”, then skip to question 200.
...
200) Sign your name:__________________


62 posted on 07/17/2012 5:25:08 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.

“On July 5 in Brooklyn, Nicholas G. Garaufis, a Clinton-appointed judge for the Eastern District of New York, issued a ruling that requires two of every five newly hired fireman to be black and one of every five, Hispanic — until the department has fulfilled the court-ordered quota of 186 black and 107 Hispanic hires.”

It was obvious to all but those who refused to see that “equal opportunity” would not even things up the way the leftist utopians envisioned. So, of course, the only remedy now is “equal outcome” by government fiat.

Not to worry, it’s working great in South Africa and Zimbabwe.


63 posted on 07/17/2012 6:06:45 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Obama’s rural executive order set it all up. He can’t act on it until after the election, but it’s coming…. unless we take back the schools .

They’ve taught the kids to “Aim for Mediocrity, it’s only fair.” They have no drive, no ambition and they don’t value education for the sake of being educated. They think that education is no but vocational training.

Do you realize that almost every college student, today, takes a required course in social justice, even graduate school students? I wouldn’t send one of my kids to a college that required a course in social justice. I would refuse to pay the tuition.


64 posted on 07/17/2012 7:32:10 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Sideways passage—the women couldn’t get through because of their breasts. I don’t think it’s a myth. Everyone was talking about this in the eighties.


65 posted on 07/17/2012 8:11:54 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Besides legalized abortion, affirmative action is the worst policy this government has embraced in the last 40 years. It is a de facto statement by the government that blacks, Hispanics, and women are inferior, and it is happily accepted as such by its “beneficiaries”.


66 posted on 07/18/2012 3:23:53 AM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Altura Ct.; justiceseeker93; SunkenCiv; fieldmarshaldj; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; Clintonfatigued; ...

Ghey.


67 posted on 07/18/2012 3:37:08 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson