Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian and American Birth Rates Have Rapidly Converged
Forbes ^ | 7/01/2012 | Mark Adomanis

Posted on 07/16/2012 8:28:12 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

I am in the middle of doing a longer post on recent Russian demographic trends, but in the course of doing research I stumbled upon something that was far too interesting to pass up.

Although Russia is often portrayed as a demographic nightmare, a “dying bear” that is rapidly receding from the world stage and that is doomed to irrelevance, and the United States is often portrayed as enjoying demographics that are uniquely robust among developed nations, I would argue that the reality is quite a bit more complicated. Although America benefits greatly from immigration, its fertility rate has actually consistently been sub-replacement for almost all of the past 20 years. Knowing that, due to the aftereffects of the Great Recession, birth rates in the United States have generally been declining for the past few years and also knowing that birth rates in Russia have been increasing I decided to create a chart showing what’s happened since the late 1990′s. Even I was surprised by the extent and the rapidity of the convergence between Russian and American birth rates*:

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Russia
KEYWORDS: birth; birthrates; demographics; russia

1 posted on 07/16/2012 8:28:19 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

2 posted on 07/16/2012 8:32:41 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Not to worry.

Thanks to the Democrat party, we will soon be the Mexico del Norte, with 100 million illegal aliens and their extended families making America a Latino nation the size of India.

With all the Third World baggage that goes with it.


3 posted on 07/16/2012 8:37:46 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

What has happened is that the European-American population has bought into the nation that having children impoverishes the nation. That we should stop having children and use our money for personal consumption. Irony: we no longer manufacture goods nor produce babies, neither create new wealth nor bring new workers into the world.


4 posted on 07/16/2012 8:37:46 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

Doing to the United States what the Labour Government has done to England.


5 posted on 07/16/2012 8:38:48 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

White women in America aren’t interested in having children anymore because they’re too busy being involved in their careers.


6 posted on 07/16/2012 8:43:28 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

As of 2010 Russia’s fertility rate is 1.54 whereas the USA is right at 2.1.

2.1 is the bare minimum replacement level.

Are you expecting Russia to meet or exceed 2.1 any time soon?


7 posted on 07/16/2012 8:49:08 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
The U.S. adds one international migrant (net) every 36 seconds. Immigrants account for one in 8 U.S. residents, the highest level in more than 90 years. In 1970 it was one in 21; in 1980 it was one in 16; and in 1990 it was one in 13. In a decade, it will be one in 7, the highest it has been in our history. And by 2050, one in 5 residents of the U.S. will be foreign-born.

Currently, 1.6 million legal and illegal immigrants settle in the country each year; 350,000 immigrants leave each year, resulting in a net immigration of 1.25 million. Since 1970, the U.S. population has increased from 203 million to 310 million, i.e., over 100 million. In the next 40 years, the population will increase by an additional 130 million to 440 million. Three-quarters of the increase in our population since 1970 and the projected increase will be the result of immigration. The U.S., the world’s third most populous nation, has the highest annual rate of population growth of any developed country in the world, i.e., 0.889% (2011 estimate,) principally due to immigration.

The US fertility rate is 2.06 children born/woman (2011 est.)

Russia has a population growth rate of -0.48% (2011 est.) Its total fertility rate is 1.43 children born/woman (2011 est.).

Russia life expectancy: total population: 66.46 years

US life expectancy: total population: 78.49 years

The above figures come from the CIA World Factbook

8 posted on 07/16/2012 9:03:24 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I question the globalists’ notion that we need to overpopulate the US to save the US. It does us no good in keeping jobs here. We just pay out the wahzoo for the chaos of overpopulation and the globalist’s enforced and orchestrated foreign tribalism.

Over populated Nations should stay that way and not ship their surplus to Western nations.

This global trade scheme works for globalists - not the people and Nations of the West. It is time for the experiment to end.


9 posted on 07/16/2012 9:38:06 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I would be interested to know the population growth rates in the heavily Muslim areas of Russia versus the Caucasian areas.


10 posted on 07/16/2012 10:22:00 PM PDT by Ranald S. MacKenzie (It's the philosophy, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

The very concept of “over population” is a leftist Malthusian construct.

It is the theoretical framework for socialism,abortion,and other forms of genocide.

There are no “over populated” nations simply inefficient economies.

From China,Pakistan,Nigeria et al.


11 posted on 07/17/2012 1:23:43 AM PDT by Reaganez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Anyone else notice that the decline in the US began in 2007... following the first full year after the Dems took control of the House and Senate?

I think folks realized the economy was going to worsen under Dem control and because they could override a Bush veto.


12 posted on 07/17/2012 2:27:17 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganez

There are no “over populated” nations simply inefficient economies.


We have mass invasion. And it will get much worse if the globalists have their way. That is what we have. Give me a different term to use.


13 posted on 07/17/2012 7:41:21 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson