Posted on 07/17/2012 11:10:04 AM PDT by RitaOK
Ron Paul? Goodness your more liberal than I imagined.
BIG FAIL!!! You and the kiddies all voted for him. Sad.
I’m not sure it matters, because we here are not united....yet.
Heck, wonder if the Paul delegates will roll over at convention like conservatives have out here. He did have a ground game and organization.
I would vote FOR, ABR, including Uncle Nutty. Anyone with a name and an army. Anyone.
Romney didn't for a second imagine Ron Paul could beat him in a primary. Ron Paul got 40% of the residual phoney Virginia primary ~ if we hadn't all been boycotting the evil Mittbots who'd criminally deprived us of a real primary, Mitt would have sufffered an intense loss to Paul.
Well, that train left the station. Sounds like 0bama will get either your vote or the benefit of your non-vote.
I`m no fan of Romney either, but 0bama has to be defeated in November.
I thought I read he had outraised Zero for the last couple of months, plus I read a big Pubby Super Pac had raised over 3x the big Dem Super Pac in June. But he doesn't seem to be spending much.
He might feel it's unseemly to go after a Chicago thug and gangster posing as a Mormon thug and gangster. Also, I thought that's traditionally the VP candidate's job. Is Tony Soprano looking for work?
"The Republicans (aka GOP-e) have lost more elections over the last 80 years than they’ve won ~ so, no, they don’t know!"
As I count it they won 12 Presidential elections over the last 100 years vs. 13 for the 'rats. (Admittedly, my counting skills over 10 fingers may be off since I started in an urban public school.)
They get all the others, so that's 8 wins in 80 years compared to 13 Democrat wins.
They are professional losers!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.