Skip to comments.Imams of Islam and the Environment
Posted on 07/19/2012 2:12:43 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross
Ideology and affluence make it possible to ignore history and destroy its monuments.
In the Arabic media, there are reports that Muslim clerics energized by the sudden emergence of Egypts new president, Mohammed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood are agitating to demolish the Egyptian pyramids. According to the imams, the pharaohs monuments represent symbols of paganism from Egypts pre-Islamic past and therefore must vanish.
Dont dismiss such insanity too easily. Islamists in Mali are currently destroying the centuries-old mausoleums of Sufi Muslim saints in the city of Timbuktu, the historic site of early Islamic scholarship and jurisprudence. But perhaps the most regrettable recent Islamist attack on the past was the Talibans 2001 dynamiting and shelling of the huge twin sixth-century statues of Buddha carved into a cliff at Bamiyan in Afghanistan. We are destroying the statues, Taliban spokesmen at the time bragged, in accordance with Islamic law, and it is purely a religious issue.
Ideologically driven and historically ignorant violence is not an Islamist monopoly. Sometimes postmodern, politically correct Westerners can be every bit as zealous and as potentially destructive of the past as premodern Islamists. One of the joys of visiting Californias Yosemite Valley is a series of historic arched bridges that span the Merced River on the valley floor. One, the 80-year-old Stoneman Bridge, is an architectural masterpiece and a tribute to Depression-era ingenuity and artistic elegance; the sister Ahwahnee Bridge and Sugar Pine Bridge were likewise designed to combine functionalism and beauty. All are used daily, are appreciated by thousands of visitors each summer, and now are listed as endangered treasures by the National Trust for Historic Preservation.
Environmental zealots are now proposing to demolish all three bridges, motivated by pie-in-the-sky dreams of allowing the flood-prone Merced River to be freed to find its original course, without human contamination. To paraphrase the Taliban, these green fundamentalists probably believe that the bridges are symbols of humanism and their destruction is purely an environmental issue.
Again, dont laugh. A petition circulated by an environmental group is forcing the city of San Francisco in a state currently struggling with a $17 billion budget shortfall to hold a November referendum on a proposal to blow up the historic OShaughnessy Dam that holds back the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir. That brilliantly engineered early-20th-century water-and-power project still supplies San Francisco and the South Bay with as much as 85 percent of their water, while providing the city with 400 megawatts of clean electrical power and providing Central Valley farms and towns with irrigation and flood control. Where the billions of dollars would come from to dynamite the vast dam and the penstocks, pipelines, and powerhouse complex and to clean up the ensuing mess; how the green electricity would be replaced; and where the Bay Areas millions of residents would find their daily water are questions that matter little to ideologues who believe the aboriginal valley of Hetch Hetchy can be reborn without mans baleful touch.
What do these present-day wars against the past have in common? One shared trait is the power of ideological zealotry, whether religious or environmental, to trump all questions of practicality, historic preservation, and reverence for prior generations. The zealots version of purity, and only his version, matters.
Modern affluence and leisure also contribute to both the ability and the desire to destroy monuments of the past. Twenty-first-century technology allows premodern Islamists to have the weaponry, and the leisure time, for such destruction. If the statutes at Bamiyan are pagan, then so are the explosives that the Taliban used to obliterate them. And it is only because water so easily flows from San Francisco faucets, and power is a matter of flicking a switch not the case in 1913, when a growing San Francisco was short on clean water and newfound electricity that todays green imams have the latitude to dream of their own version of a pure and uncontaminated paradise.
A general historical ignorance among the public at large plays a role, too. Just as fundamentalist madrassas pound dogma into the heads of students without any historical appreciation of the richness and variety of religions in the early Middle East, so too have politically driven courses in our universities crowded out broad classes in history. Students in our own versions of the madrassas can recite all the commandments of their sacred green texts, but they know very little about the nations past and almost nothing about the constant poverty, physical ordeal, and, yes, early death that our forefathers struggled against to ensure that we might not.
Beware of the wages of professed purity, whether religious or environmental whether it targets a mausoleum in Timbuktu or a stone arched bridge in Yosemite.
David Horowitz wrote a book about the partnership between the Left and radical Islam (I think that’s even the title). I have it here somewhere. Everyone should buy it at Amazon.com.
Stoneman Bridge on the Merced River in Yosemite National Park
Wacko environmentalists in a tree in Berkeley, CA
I say, let them flatten the pyramids.
Show the world where they stand.
On a big scale.
Wow! Islam is such a tolerant and diverse religion.