Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Garvin-MP

“Here is what I found from 1960/61. Scroll down to 6/12. Code 9 states ‘Other Non White’ while the liberal detractors say Zullo used a 1969 code 9 for ‘Not Stated’ in the press conference. Zullo did mention those words.”

Well, I’ve found the same thing. The Federal Government did not bother to record the race of the parents, but, only the race of the child. In 1961 a 9 certainly did mean “Other Non white”, and by using that code, the system would not have listed Obama’s race as a negro.

Zullo and Corsi set this false info up and they can claim that they got this info from Verna K L Lee. Remember, she’s 95 years old, and probably just forgot that the meaning of a 9 changed in the later 1960’s.

I’ve noticed two other things though. The Feds did track Month of birth. August is the 8th month, yet on Obama’s Birth Certificate, you’ll see it was coded as a 1, meaning January in the time of birth slot. Also, on the Nordyke twins Birth Certificates, their births are coded as 1-2 and 2-2 just like one would number boxes being shipped. Obama’s should have been coded as 1-1, but instead it says X - X. An X means “not stated”.


125 posted on 07/24/2012 10:49:33 AM PDT by chatter4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: chatter4

“The Feds did track Month of birth. August is the 8th month, yet on Obama’s Birth Certificate, you’ll see it was coded as a 1, meaning January in the time of birth slot.’

I don’t see “1” in the month box but there is “1” in the hour box. The Nordykes also have “1”s in the hour boxes. So does the August 23rd, 1961 BC. I think in this case “1” stands for “P” as in “P.M.”.

“Also, on the Nordyke twins Birth Certificates, their births are coded as 1-2 and 2-2 just like one would number boxes being shipped. Obama’s should have been coded as 1-1, but instead it says X - X. An X means “not stated”.”

The WND August 23rd, 1961 BC also has “X - X”

http://www.wnd.com/2011/09/342937/


159 posted on 07/24/2012 1:51:59 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

To: chatter4

9 was a nearly universal code indicating a blank/null numeric field. A decade or so later, when the code was changed to two digits, as was reported earlier in this thread, notice that the 9 for “not stated” became, wonder of wonders, 99!

Ask anybody who worked in computer programming, coding, keypunching, etc., back in the days of punched cards and magnetic tape. 9 was filler for a numeric field that could not be left blank but for which there was no data supplied.

When, for example, a person didn’t have a social security number but a computer program required a number to be in that field, 999999999 was the social security number and it meant, guess what? There wasn’t a number to put in so we filled it with 9s.

That’s why when the race field was left blank on that birth certificate, Verna coded it 9. When the type of business was left blank, Verna coded it 9. It’s simple. It’s common knowledge among people old enough to know and remember.

Don’t insult the woman by saying she’s old and forgot. When you spend hours and hours, day in and day out, for years, coding stuff like this, you don’t “forget”. Zullo is a detective and has been in law enforcement for years. He knows how to investigate and he’s smart enough to make sure before he makes allegations. Prosecutors make sure to keep cops on their toes.


188 posted on 07/24/2012 7:57:28 PM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson