“And both Race of Father and Race of Mother have a “size of Field” allocation as 1.”
I don’t dispute that the race of the parents was coded by the the Feds but did they code the parents place of birth? I don’t see any mention of the parents place of birth in the 1968 or 1961 tape instructions. Do you?
Why code something that was not required by the Feds?
“Well how do you know that the FOIA wasn’t only a partial release?”
I don’t. But what has been released, the tape instructions, is in the exact same format as the 1968 tape instructions used by the CCP.
“Which image are you talking about again, specifically? You’re kind of vague there.”
Sorry, I assumed you were familar with it.
Here’s the link to the WND August 23rd, 1961 BC.
http://www.wnd.com/2011/09/342937/
Why code something that was not required by the Feds?
Good question. Maybe you should ask Hawaii instead of me. Or maybe they were required and we're just not aware of it. You know, as in the requirement was carried over from one year to the next without the necessity of it being spelled out.
I don't have all the answers. As I've @said before I'm really only making educated guesses.
Sorry, I assumed you were familar with it.
Well you made an ass of u, not me, by not being specific.
It shows a “3” as the race of parents. By the Feds that means they were American Indians. And in parents place of birth they are both listed as “1”. Is that the code for Hawaii? Are they ethnic Hawaiians?
Well find the code and figure it out for yourself! And as soon as you do fill me in.
Hey, here's a thought...maybe it means 1 - "Residents" or 2 - "Nonresidents by place of residence"
Just an educated guess.
You keep saying “coded by the Feds”. What “Feds” are you talking about? The NIHS, the CDC, etc... etc... what in the world do they have to do with the State of Hawaii’s Dept. of Vital Statistics? There were no “Feds” coding these BCs.