Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4Zoltan
So what has 1964 info got to do with 1961?
And it still doesn't explain how "African" got on there.

And before 1964 a term like “yellow” or “African” would be forced into one of the specific categories like “nonwhite, Chinese, or Japanese”

And even now, whether you realize it or not, you're admitting that there was no "specific category" of "African" for anything to be forced into.

Here ya go...what "specific category" would Caucasian go in?

153 posted on 07/24/2012 1:18:13 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36; Fred Garvin-MP

“you’re admitting that there was no “specific category” of “African” for anything to be forced into. “

There was the category “other nonwhite”, it is listed in the tape instructions (1961 and 1968) and in the Vital Statistic reprots for 1961 and 1968.

I point out the 1964 “yellow” reference to show that BCs can sometimes have weird or as they politely call them “ill-defined or not clearly identifiable races”. Ill defined entries are more likely the results of the parents self-reporting then the hospital staff screwing up.

Forcing “African” into a specific category means coding it using one of the predefined categories, not changing what the parents wrote down.


155 posted on 07/24/2012 1:39:05 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: philman_36

http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2012/07/26/did-corsi-lie-to-zullo-a-real-1961-vital-statistics-instruction-manual/


225 posted on 07/26/2012 1:02:39 PM PDT by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson