Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Sivana

I haven’t read all the comments yet, so forgive if I repeat what someone else has said.

If #9 in 1961 actually meant “other non-white”

then explain how they got from “African” to #9 (other NON-white)

when Africa had many WHITE people living in it in 1961.

“African” tells nothing about race, so how would anyone like the perfectionist Ms. Lee ASSUME “non-white”?


184 posted on 07/24/2012 6:48:53 PM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Greenperson
If #9 in 1961 actually meant “other non-white” then explain how they got from “African” to #9 (other NON-white) when Africa had many WHITE people living in it in 1961.

Of course, and even moreso in a place like Hawaii, which is both familiar with a vast array of races, ethnicities and nationalities compared to, say, Helena Montana or Burlington Vt where a foregn black from Afrca might have been a bit of a novelty in 1961.
207 posted on 07/25/2012 4:21:36 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I love to hear you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."-Del Shannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson