“In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled NCAA and Big Ten sanctions imposed against Penn State , MrEdd wrote:
And you also oppose the biblical principles of restitution and amends, by your posts on this ...”
Hardly. This forced charity does not provide restitution to Sanduskys victims. It amounts to liberalism. You like it OK.
So your contention is that the charities will be screening the people they help to make sure none of them were abused while at the Second Mile?
Prove your contention.
The fine is bogus, you’re talking about essentially 12 million a year for five years, for a University that has a total endowment of $1.7 Billion (that’s with a ‘B’)
Of course the civil suits are coming, and I suspect that will take a much larger bite out of that endowment.