Posted on 07/24/2012 4:12:02 PM PDT by SupplySider
There are generally just two ways people deal with each other: with reason or with force.
Reason is the businessperson's approach. Regardless if he is a trader, a CEO or lemonade-stand operator, the capitalist understands that if he wants something from you, he's got to offer you a value in return. He can't force you to buy his real estate, "green" energy, or failing auto company, he can only try and convince you though discussion and trade that it's in your own self interest. The choice is always yours.
That basic fundamental negates the cliched and commonplace assertion, popularized even by our own elected officials, that trade is destructive and that profit-seeking businessmen are evil. In reality, just the opposite is true: Regardless if it's for a share of stock, an education or a sandwich, voluntary trade is productive as both parties' needs are satisfied. After all, that's why they're trading.
Force is not the tool of businessmen, but of bureaucrats. Whereas a businessman must appeal to your mind, government bureaucrats effectively put a gun to your head. They force you to you pay for banks, insurance companies, and deadbeat homeowners. They also force businesses to sell certain types of products, offer certain types of wages and operate in a certain fashion.
If a hooded thug stole your savings or tied your arms behind your back, we'd call it a crime. It's still a crime even though it's a suit-wearing bureaucrat doing the stealing.
In a free market, the economic power achieved by Wal-Mart (WMT: 72.14, 0.29, 0.40%), McDonald's (MCD: 88.06, -0.88, -0.99%) or any other successful company has been earned, not expropriated.
And while a businessman can't insist you to act against your own judgment, our government can and increasingly does, Obamacare is just the latest example of government force replacing individuals' own voluntary judgment regarding what's in their own self interest.
Stripped of the flowery language about how "we are our brother's keeper" and "the common good", government intervention into the free market is done by those who believe your judgment or voluntary choice is moot.
For over four years, government has been engaged in an arbitrary campaign purportedly to spur economic growth. Every single initiative, from stifling regulation to "Cash for Clunkers" to inflationary manipulation of interest rates has involved the use of government force, the result of which has been more debt, less liberty and continued economic lethargy. Economic freedom, as we wrote last year, remains the one stimulus that has yet to be actually tried.
The reason the average income in communist North Korea is $1,800/year compared to nearly $50,000 in the United States isn't because the water in New York Harbor is any different than that in Pyongyang. Rather, it's the ideas and dominant philosophy that determine the result. North Korea, like Cuba, Venezuela, Zimbabwe and a long list of other collectivist countries, employ force against their own citizens as a matter of practice. The results speak for themselves.
The United States' historical success came not from natural resources or global plunder, but ideological commitment to reason. From the smallest start-up to the S&P 500's biggest names, wealth is a product of man's capacity to think: to deal with others in voluntary, mutually beneficial and productive trade.
If Washington and the American people are looking for a "secret sauce" to remedy our economic malaise, that's it.
Jonathan Hoeing is managing member at Capitalistpig Hedge Fund LLC
Great article. Anyone who has ever dealt a government bureaucrat understands their ‘you-don’t-have-a-choice-in-the-matter’ attitude.
If increased taxation is such a good thing, then why don’t we tax at 100% and then the government can just people what they need?
Oh...wait...that’s been tried. Let’s see, the USSR, China, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela’s almost there, and look how happy the people are, and how productive those countries are! /s
If increased taxation is such a good thing, then why don’t we tax at 100% and then the government can just provide people what they need?
Oh...wait...that’s been tried. Let’s see, the USSR, China, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela’s almost there, and look how happy the people are, and how productive those countries are! /s
” Anyone who has ever dealt a government bureaucrat understands their ‘you-don’t-have-a-choice-in-the-matter’ attitude. “
In later years, employees (especially the cynically mis-labeled Customer ‘Service’ Representatives) of larger corporations (notably - banks, cable companies, phone companies) have arrogated to themselves the attitudes and assumed power of Gummint Bureaucrats....
Kansas City business Journal today said that 569 small businesses have failed since 2009 under President Obama’s watch.
http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2012/07/24/kansas-city-area-loses-569-small.html?ana=fbk
The Kansas City metropolitan area lost 569 small businesses between 2009 and 2010, according to an analysis of newly released U.S. Census Bureau data.
This is the differences between freedom and slavery.
Government is nothing more than force. raw, cruel, force that robs a man of his individuality & freedom. No liberal should ever be spared a reminder of this cold & basic fact about the nature of Government vs private enterprise.
I imagine he more or less agrees with Mr. Hoenig, but he seems to have made the calculation that he should avoid this central point of the election to avoid being branded the out-of-touch rich guy.
But Dems will say that no matter what.
Reagan went over the heads of the media and made a principled case directly to the citizenry. In my humble opinion Romney must do the same.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.