Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rurgan
You are for this UN tyranny

No, I'm asking for the evidence before I become concerned ...

I read up to point 14 (which the original poster skipped) and that was enough for me to conclude this is not worth getting all wee-weed up about ...

You must be a democrat mole.

You got me ... I blew my cover.

19 posted on 07/25/2012 11:42:58 AM PDT by dartuser ("If you are ... what you were ... then you're not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: dartuser; rurgan; Travis McGee

Again, it’s not a disarmament demand, it’s a registration demand, which is counter to American gun rights anyway.

Read some history concerning registration schemes during WWII and in Soviet Russia and follow where they lead.

I’m sure Travis could provide some informative graphics of the same.


23 posted on 07/25/2012 11:45:44 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: dartuser

The UN is the ultimate evil in the world, a den full of marxist vipers so vile they make a multi-headed hydra seem saintly. For you to attribute anything but the ultimate evil motive to this enemy of America and freedom shows you are a democrat


25 posted on 07/25/2012 11:48:51 AM PDT by rurgan (Sunset all laws at 4 years.China is destroying U.S. ability to manufacture,makes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: dartuser
private ownership and use of conventional arms exclusively for, inter alia, recreational, cultural, historical and sporting

That is not what the 2nd Amendment is about.

I read up to point 14 (which the original poster skipped) and that was enough for me to conclude this is not worth getting all wee-weed up about ...

If you are not "wee-weed up", then you neither understand and/or support the Constitution.
28 posted on 07/25/2012 11:54:48 AM PDT by PA Engineer ("We're not programs, Gerty, We're People")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: dartuser
Suggest you read the entire document, while it says implementation with respect for national laws, it also tells the signatory once ratify, they must pass legislation to bring the signatory into compliance with the treaty and report compliance annually. Therefore once ratified we enter the implementation stage once implemented, we enter the enforcement stage where it becomes an issue of the camels nose getting in under the tent. Once ratified it would only take Obama a Chicago second to push for ammo registration or gun registration under the guise of a implementation of a treaty ratified by a bipartisn group of Senators. It is always the "unintended (intended) consequences" that bite you in the a$$ down the road.
60 posted on 07/25/2012 12:49:30 PM PDT by OldGoatCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: dartuser
I read up to point 14 (which the original poster skipped) and that was enough for me to conclude this is not worth getting all wee-weed up about ...

So, you were able to magically infer all the details of the document from the first 14 points(?)

92 posted on 07/25/2012 1:57:30 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson