Why can’t the simple term “shall not be infringed” be understood. To me that means if your 10 states away and you pass a law impeding my rights to defend myself, it’s still infringing because I may need to go there someday. I don’t understand why the legal system has such a problem with English.
Maybe there should be a law in place requiring a citizen have a good reason why they should be allowed to exercise their 1st amendment rights, or any rights. Maybe the citizens should require the govt. to have a good reason why they need my tax money to give it to someone else.