Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

I doubt that 1 AR15 has been sold here.
A fully automatic military assault rifle?

Or something that looks like one without the auto feature?
Same thing with the AK


4 posted on 07/27/2012 4:11:05 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bill1952

From wikipedia:

“The select-fire AR-15 entered the US military system as the M16 rifle. Colt then marketed the Colt AR-15 as a semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle for civilian sales in 1963.[8] The name “AR-15” is a Colt registered trademark, which refers only to the semi-automatic rifle.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15


5 posted on 07/27/2012 4:17:28 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
Apart from a few rifles made by ArmaLite during ordnance testing and to equip some U.S. Army observers in South Vietnam *very* early in that war, all military versions of that rifle were designated as either an M16 or one of the recent successors. After Colt took over production in the early '60s, "AR-15" has been widely recognized as the name of the semi-auto civilian version.

That's quite different than the case of the AK-47, where there was no separately designated semi-auto-only version for decades.

18 posted on 07/27/2012 4:45:57 AM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952
I doubt that 1 AR15 has been sold here. A fully automatic military assault rifle?

Contrary to widely held belief by liberals, it is not illegal to own full auto firearms or suppressors. It's not even illegal to own belt fed full auto with no select feature for single shot. All that is required is a $200 tax stamp issued by the BATFE. You can create a revokable trust that is also transferrable (temporarily or permanent by inheritance) and use that as the vehicle to bypass rigid local law enforcement who may otherwise be required for signature of permission. Very few police chiefs in any metro area will sign such a document without risking a public lynching in the press for no reason. In all the time since this system took effect (70+ years) only one crime has been committed by a man with such a weapon AND the stamp and HE was a police officer who had access to such weapons, anyway! Tell me gun control is about the instruments and not about control of the law abiding.

165 posted on 07/29/2012 12:00:16 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Stand up and be counted... OR LINE UP AND BE NUMBERED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952

Pedantic.
AR15 = semi-auto version of the M16.
Yes the gun originally dubbed “AR15” was originally full auto. Terms change over time, just as “films” are digitally rendered now, “batteries” are portable electric storage devices, etc.
And you know it, so stop trying to confuse & muddle an already contentious issue.


185 posted on 11/24/2012 8:29:55 AM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: bill1952

Sorry, didn’t realize this was a resurrected thread.


186 posted on 11/24/2012 8:32:10 AM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson