Eva, this is U. N. goble de goop all the way.
It’s stuff like this that causes me to detest the U. N.
Why does the U. N. address these issues? Why because they want to be seen as the unbiased arbiter. And of course, there must be one, because the U. N. says so.
If there’s no need for an unbiased arbiter, there’s no need for guess who. Certainly there’s a lot less need for guess who.
The U. N. has it’s paws all over our business in this nation. It should draw back a stump or two for it’s efforts, and get booted sooner rather than later.
Thank you for your responses.
I don’t know about Oregon, but WA state doesn’t need the UN to direct it’s imperialistic treatment of the rural areas of the state. In WA, there is no such thing as “suburbia”. Either it is a city or town, or it is “unincorporated area with no self rule, colonies, if you will, of the state, with some local county rule that must adhere to strict guidelines laid down by the state.
The rural areas of the state are the colonies that exist solely at the pleasure of the state, to be regulated and exploited for the greater good of the state. The law suit over the water rights, state that there are no water rights on private property, except those that were deeded before some Indian Treaty. The goal is to meter all well water and limit the amount of water the property owner can use and charge the property owner for what he does use.