I'll take a stab at revising it:
Pitchfork Pat is well known as an apologist for and coddler of enemies of the Joos.
A little better.
There are, however, those who are interested in things like, say, national sovereignty, who believe that it was probably both unwise and illegal for the fledgling United Nations to attempt to justify its new-found power by imposing a nation out of thin air in 1948. As a capitulation to Jewish terrorism, I might add.
There are probably many Americans who would similarly oppose the arbitrary declaration, by an international governing body, of an ethnic nation within our own borders.
The fact that other colonial powers had screwed up the region prior to the United Nations exercising its new sovereignty does not particularly mitigate the event for me.
My personal opinion is "it's been done and the world has to deal with the situation", but I, for one, don't think the UN ever had any right to do such a thing.
IMHO, those who do acquiesce to the exercise of such power by the UN are somewhat less concerned about national sovereignty than they claim.
I guess to some the UN only sucks when it tries to do something they disagree with. I happen to hold the opinion that the UN sucks, period.