Well, apparently you are having difficulty in finding your glutaeus maximus with either hand, figuratively speaking (maybe literally also?); for what we have is, and what you wish for "isn't." You still haven't found out whether I think that is good or bad. The fact is that persons who have been legally judged unfit to wander loose may not lawfully acquire or use deadly weapons. Do you think that is a good or a bad law? Hmmm?
While you are apparently willing to use whatever tortured legal word smithing in common vogue to uphold the status quo, the rest of us a rightfully fed up with it.
Your supposition seems a bit confused, for I have said nothing about upholding a status quo which, according to your claims, "isn't."
Morons like you take a prefatory clause like “general welfare” and use it to prop up Socialist welfare and illegal expansions of Federal power.
Perhaps you were not aware from your social origins and command of the language that there are other meanings for the word "welfare," and that "being on the dole" is not the one intemded by the Founders; and furthermore that the words they had in mind were synonyms like "prosperity" or "success" or "affluence" or literally, "well-being"?
We are not putting up with your BS any more.
I guess you and the mouse in your pocket want to wipe out the First Amendment to the Constitution, as well as eliminating the plain applications of its principles embodied in Article 1 Section 8 -- especially in its independent, free-standing last paragraph?
Deal with it troll...
Yup. I just did. Thanks for the opportunity! Are you free-floatimg yet? Blanks never win a battle of wits.
Ciao ---
It's irrelevant. You are the one making a claim for infringement of our RKBA due to the Preamble of the Constitution. This is not an operative clause, but prefatory. This lack of basic reading skills is self evident...
Your supposition seems a bit confused, for I have said nothing about upholding a status quo...
Which only points out the fact that you have no idea what "status quo" means. Because you just got done saying...
for what we have is, and what you wish for "isn't."
Ugh... what a dumbass. I can hardly wait until you kids go back to school.
...and that "being on the dole" is not the one intemded by the Founders; ...
Nor did they intend for prefatory clauses to be used as operative clauses. The Preamble has no force in law. Art 1 Sec 8 does. That is why liberals scumbags normally have problems with the "militia" clause of the Second Amendment as well. It doesn't make them, or you, right. But I'm sure it makes them feel clever.
Article 1 Section 8
Actually, your are thinking Art 6 para 2. That is the clause that makes the Bill of rights apply. Later, the 14th add "privileges and immunities". The First stands on it's own and contains several operative clauses.
You really might want to go back and sign up for a remedial English Comp course. If you don't, you will never get that High School diploma...