Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
Do you think that is a good or a bad law? (imardmd1)

It's irrelevant. You are the one making a claim for infringement of our RKBA due to the Preamble of the Constitution. This is not an operative clause, but prefatory. This lack of basic reading skills is self evident... (Dead Corpse)

I don't think that I have mentioned anything about infringing the rights verbalized in the Second Amendment.

Now, IIRC (and correct me if I am wrong), it is a State Court (not a Federal Court) by recommendation of a licensed psychiatrist which orders the involuntary commitment of an individual into a secure psychiatric facility.

Such a person has been adjudged of being deranged, or capable of reversion to derangement; unless recertified as fit by recommendation of a licensed psychiatrist and Court Order. Now, Federal Gun Laws prohibit such a person during or after release from contact with firearms or ammo.

(1) Show me how this is infringement of the Second Amendment to the Constitution.
(2) Answer me: Is a Federal law prohibiting such a person from firearms and ammo a bad law or a good law?
(3) Does such a law serve the interests and Constitutional protection of the general population?

Thank you.

64 posted on 07/31/2012 2:29:55 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Be forearmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1

There can be no Federal gun laws. It violates the Constitution. You know, that pesky “shall not be infringed” thingie you keep blatantly ignoring.


68 posted on 07/31/2012 8:09:11 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson