I hate to be in the position of defending pelosi, but kristol took her comment completely out of context. She didn’t say he had been ‘to Israel’. She meant FOR Israel. Just as delusional, but kristol blew it.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/pelosi-republican-jews-being-exploited_649077.html
Pelosi responded, “Well, that’s how they’re being exploited. And they’re smart people. They follow these issues. But they have to know the facts. And the fact is that President Obama has been the strongest person in terms of sanctions on Iran, which is important to Israel. He’s been the strongest person on whether it’s Iron Dome, David’s Sling, any of these weapons systems and initiatives that relate to Israel. He has been there over and over again.”
I see that it was used as a metaphor, as in
"I've visited that issue many times".
This is an important clarification that we need to know.
/salute
I see that it was used as a metaphor, as in
"I've visited that issue many times".
This is an important clarification that we need to know.
/salute
So what she is trying to imply, is that Obama has been for them over and over again. He just has not been with them over and over again. This is a hardcore Marxist brainwashing tactic. Definitely did not come from Pelosi. They are implying that being for someone is as good as being with someone. Unfortunately she did not list all those times Obama has been against Israel (delaying Iran action, creating chaos in Syria, not selling F22, etc. etc.). Far more then he has been for Israel. And I think we can all agree that being against someone is not the same as being with someone.