Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rodguy911
True and that “rich” category has to do with the tax code and who they say is “rich” regardless of whether the money is actually paid to the small business owner or not.Many of us take out only enough to get by so we can plow everything back into the business.

I apologize in advance for my ignorance --:( -- but I do recall reading that if a small business is organized as an S Corporation, the owner's reported income is misleading. If this is indeed the case, someone should explain it. Or maybe I misunderstood . . . all too possible . . .

167 posted on 07/29/2012 1:46:35 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: maryz

Someone will correct me if I’m wrong but I’ll try. A Sub S Corporation provides the protections against law suits, as a regular C Corporation. However, the income from a Sub S passes through to the owner as regular income and taxed as personal income. If the person is a C Corporation, he or she would have to pay both corporate taxes and personal taxes.


171 posted on 07/29/2012 2:40:03 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver (Democrats: The law of unintended consequences in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

To: maryz

I wish I could explain it. Only one of the many reason I have a huge CPA bill every month.


185 posted on 07/29/2012 5:06:16 PM PDT by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson