Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moonshot925
Should give it the advantage in BVR combat.

Problem is that most aerial combat doesn't take place at BVR, but at ranges of two miles or less. They made the same incorrect assumptions that the USAF made in the 1950s, until MiG-17s, MiG-21s, and perpetually stupid ROEs made a mockery of U.S. fighters during the Vietnam air war.

These people never learn.

17 posted on 07/31/2012 9:46:27 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Timber Rattler

One thing to “learn” is that technologies improve. Big difference between vacuum tube BVR missiles of Vietnam like the early Sparrow (that would malfunction if you sneezed within 10 feet) and a modern solid-state BVR missle.

IFF has also improved.

Technologies that don’t live up to their billing in one conflict can be a different story 40 years later. History is useful, but to proclaim that because of Vietnam, BVR will not work till the end of time is silly.


48 posted on 07/31/2012 10:31:37 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson