Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

You present yourself as a Martyr
You present yourself as Jesus

It would be hard for anyone to read your pompous posts and say otherwise.

If you wish to win legal arguments you must rest your opinion on the opinions of others.

Your opinion does not stand, and can not stand, as no opinion of any weight, at law, or in politics, agrees with you.


135 posted on 07/31/2012 7:20:48 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58; butterdezillion; MHGinTN
Kansas58, calling butterdezillion 'pompous' seems to be an exercise in projection on your part. It's also unjustified. Let me assure you that butter is far from alone. More and more people are shaking off their normalcy biases and recognizing that the simultaneous failures of the rule of law, jurisprudence, checks and balances, and media vigilance and impartiality are real. The failure to vet Obama the candidate or modulate Obama the president are just some of the symptoms. These failures are consistent with a systematic and treasonous attack on our government and culture from within. The attack started with Article II Section 1, but clearly has proceeded far beyond it in the last three plus years (some would say one hundred years).
143 posted on 07/31/2012 7:50:28 PM PDT by Hetuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58

You are utterly incapable of following a logical argument. I brought up Jesus because if you measured Him with the same stick you’re measuring everybody else He would be the world’s biggest failure.

It has nothing to do with me. It has to do with your argument, and why it is total bunk. It’s actually got a name, the logic you’re trying to use. It’s called an argument from authority: “since nobody else agrees with you, you must be wrong.”

“The earth is shaking, buildings are falling apart - but if the experts say the ground is not shaking then you must be wrong if you say it is.” That logic is wrong. Truth is truth, even if none of the “experts” acknowledge it.

In fact, that’s precisely what is meant by “unalienable Rights”. They exist even if nobody in authority acknowledges it. All the authorities can do is either abide by those rights, or violate them. They can’t deny them away. The basis of the argument you’re making denies the reality of objective truth and unalienable rights. That fallacy is dangerous.

I had hoped you would be able to see it more clearly if you saw your own fingers pointing at JESUS and calling Him an utter failure because He died alone with all the cool people condemning Him and the vast majority of the normal people spitting on Him and mocking Him.

Even the image of your own self mocking and spitting on Jesus wasn’t enough to shake you out of your twisted thinking. I’m just gonna submit you to Jesus, because it is clear that nothing I can say or do is going to pull you out of this place you’re at.

For the record, I am not worthy to be counted with Jesus in any way, shape, or form, and the joy of my life is that He in His great mercy - just because of Who He is - loved me anyway, took the rightful punishment I deserved for my sin, and saved me. I have been buried with Him through baptism into His death, and because I am connected to Him I will also rise with Him. He is everything. Anything good that comes from me or from my life is His gift. My message to anybody who is willing to listen is that if God can love somebody like me, He can love anybody. The one thing I cannot live without is Him, so if He gets thrown out the door so do I, and what anybody else thinks about that makes no difference to me. He is my life.

Regarding legal opinion, since when has Rush Limbaugh been a binding legal opinion? You’re not citing legal opinions. I’ve given you two cases where the legal opinion of a judge was a sharia ruling - a judgment based upon no evidence whatsoever. Is that problematic to you at all?

When you say “no opinion of any weight, at law or in politics”, you’re writing off all the people I mentioned earlier - most specifically HAWAII STATE REGISTRAR ALVIN ONAKA, WHO HAS INDIRECTLY CONFIRMED THAT THE BIRTH RECORD HAWAII HAS FOR OBAMA IS NOT LEGALLY VALID.

You write off the people who think this issue is important as if their opinion has no “weight, at law or in politics”. That’s a logical fallacy also, called the “No True Scotsman” fallacy. It’s where you say no true Scotsman is blond, because anybody who is blond must not be a true Scotsman. It’s circular reasoning and therefore a logical fallacy. This is basic Logic 101.

Your reasoning is badly flawed. It is not based on evidence but on fallacies. Your method seems to be to try to isolate and alienate anybody who disagrees with you, which is an Alinsky tactic. You have ignored the substance of both the arguments and facts that have been presented to you. Because of those things it is a waste of my time to talk to you. In your current condition you cannot process what is being presented to you.


144 posted on 07/31/2012 7:53:42 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58
If you wish to win legal arguments you must rest your opinion on the opinions of others.

Dear God! Make it stop! Will this blithering idiot NEVER stop assaulting sanity?

230 posted on 08/01/2012 2:08:05 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson