Haha ha. Only people of “importance” have this issue “right”?...ha ha ha
That’s when you know you are winning the argument....when you have resort to saying no one of “importance” agrees with you! Ha ha. I’m guessing Zero and the legions of folks willing to look the other way are people of “importance”. Ha ha.
The condescension is a nice touch. Ha ha. I guess us “low caliber” folk will just shirk away. Ha ha
Clearly the founding fathers rejected your claim.
“Hamilton’s suggested presidential citizenship eligibility requirement was that a Citizen simply had to be ‘born a Citizen’ of the USA, i.e., a Citizen by Birth. But that citizenship status was overwhelmingly rejected by the framers as insufficient. Instead of allowing any person “born a citizen” to be President and Commander of the military, the framers chose to adopt the more stringent requirement recommended by John Jay, i.e., requiring the Citizen to be a “natural born Citizen“, to block any chance of future Presidents owing allegiance to other foreign nations or claims on their allegiance at birth from becoming President and Commander of the Military.. Therefore, the President of the United States must be a “natural born citizen” with unity of citizenship and sole allegiance to the United States at birth.”
You think your opinion is more valuable than the opinions of:
Judges
Elected officials
Immigration attorneys
Historians
Yes, their opinions are more important than yours, and NONE of them are on your side.
You see? To WIN you must convince at least some of these folks that your crackpot interpretation is correct.
You have failed to do that.
Why do you think that is?
No, you are not winning, you have lost at every turn.
You are in denial.
My point is not to open your closed and hopeless mind, my point is to help those reading these threads understand that they should avoid you and your fringe and false legal theories.