Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oregon criminalizes permaculture; claims state ownership over all rainwater
http://www.naturalnews.com/036615_Oregon_rainwater_permaculture.html ^

Posted on 08/01/2012 5:54:54 AM PDT by dontreadthis

Jackson County, Oregon says it owns YOUR rainwater, and the county has sentenced a man to 30 days in jail and fined him over $1500, for the supposed "crime" of collecting rainwater on his own property.

The man's name is Gary Harrington, and he owns over 170 acres of land in Jackson County. On that land, he has three ponds, and those ponds collect rainwater that falls on his land. Common sense would say Gary has every right to have ponds with water on his 170 acres of land, but common sense has been all but abandoned in the state of Oregon.

(Excerpt) Read more at naturalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: 2012; govtabuse; liberalfascism; rapeofliberty; sourcetitlenoturl; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: dontreadthis

Permaculture >>> to a large extent means edible landscaping. Meaning fewer ornamentals and more food plants on your property. Such as fruit and nut trees and vegetable garden. Maybe chickens and bees. Lots of freepers practice this on their property and so do I

I have friends who capture rainwater off their roof into barrels. They water their plants and trees with rainwater which they prefer to city water plus it is free


41 posted on 08/01/2012 7:44:10 AM PDT by dennisw (Government be yo mamma - Re-elect Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Thanks for the brief history lesson!!that was excellent!


42 posted on 08/01/2012 7:48:15 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
And if he let the ponds dry up, the Feds would be after him for destroying Wet Lands.

Oh, there are so many laws on the books (everywhere!), and so many of them contradictory, that if THEY want to get you for any reason whatsoever, they will, and all without breaking a sweat.

Just like Ayn Rand warned...

CA....

43 posted on 08/01/2012 7:59:37 AM PDT by Chances Are (Seems I've found that silly grin again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2; Portcall24
Owning land carries with it the ownership of space above and below that land.

As I see it, and without explicit written restrictions ... Oil rights, mineral rights and space above land (clouds, delivered contents. etc) belong to the landowner.

How this turns out should be interesting.

44 posted on 08/01/2012 8:06:38 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

Thanks, I really didn’t want to get that deep into the matter, I’ve tried hard to forget the legal side of this. Water rights law in the west has always sucked as it has always seemed to favor the jerks down stream if they had more money or votes. Heck, they even diverted water through the Continental Divide to feed a thirsty Denver.

My concern in this day and age, we could well see the administration try to place the Prior Appropriation Standard on the very air we breathe.


45 posted on 08/01/2012 8:16:44 AM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
In this area the Iroquois imposed a rule on the tributary tribes to the effect that they, the Iroquois owned any land bordering any other tribe's claim a full arrow flight's distance from their far side of the creek!

That gave the Iroquis total possession of the creek, it's tributaries, and all the water drinking game animals on the other side.

They may have done it differently in the core area of New York where they had to deal only with other Confederation members and their slaves.

BTW, that gave them exclusive control of the water rights.

46 posted on 08/01/2012 8:17:18 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Portcall24

“The truth about this issue was posted here earlier in the week. This guy was diverting the river into the ponds”

Yeah, in Colorado this is right up there with cattle thieving. Essentially, all water in Colorado is privately owned, ownership being determined by who grabbed and used it first back in the day, and subsequent grabs thereafter. Water rights are owned, bought, and sold like real estate, and water companies are very similar to condo associations in the way they are operated by the shareholders.

We have a saying in Colorado: “You can steal my wife, but not my water”


47 posted on 08/01/2012 8:50:57 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet
So when the previous owner sold you "the surface rights", and not "the water rights" and not "the mineral rights" and not "other rights that may be discovered", what was it you bought?

Sometimes when you buy land you don't really get the "land" ~ you get a right to exercise surface rights.

It can be very complicated which is why there are lawyers. Even if there were no crime we'd have lawyers fighting over land for us.

48 posted on 08/01/2012 8:59:09 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

And if we keep moving out of the shadow of tyrany, instead of fighting it, we will soon run out of planet eh?

When men claim the rain and air over your land, you are not free, you are a peon.

Yeah, Washington has the same rain shadow effect. But they persicute people with rain barrels on their downspouts to water their gardens. All in the name of “fairness”.

BS. It’s Tyrany with velvet gloves.


49 posted on 08/01/2012 9:33:34 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel; muawiyah; dontreadthis

Nobody “owns” rain, or air.


While stationed in the U.K., I learned that England’s Subjects are taxed for using screens on their houses because “the Queen’s air flowed through their homes.” While building houses, they pay a special window tax for using “the Queen’s sunlight.”

Maybe we forgot that we’re not subject to the government; the government is subject to us.


50 posted on 08/01/2012 9:42:24 AM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse (If there is a war on women, the Kennedys are the Spec Ops troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Why is it that liberals don’t recognize that their own leaders & policy’s are at the root of every REAL despotism?


51 posted on 08/01/2012 9:58:46 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel

“And if we keep moving out of the shadow of tyrany, instead of fighting it, we will soon run out of planet eh?”

Agreed but patriots in Oregon are perhaps too few in number to make an effective fight. Perhaps it is wise to withdraw to a freer state where you can stand with your patriot brothers and make a meaningful stand.

In this case there is much reason to believe that leftist will destroy Oregon and stoon become so disgusted with the monster they created that they will find reason to abandon it. The trick we have to pull off is figure out how to FORCE them to face the things they have done, and admit it was their own doing.


52 posted on 08/01/2012 10:03:06 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

I moved to Alaska... CCW without papers, nice place so far. Blessings on ya my FRiend.


53 posted on 08/01/2012 10:15:08 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Of course, your well water is next...


54 posted on 08/01/2012 11:26:06 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"The question of who has a right to the water extends back much further than your relatives arriving and upsetting the rightful owners."

The tyranny may or may not. Getting a high population density of cornered 'rats who empower heavily bunkered, unelected bureaucrats causes all sorts of problems.

55 posted on 08/01/2012 12:29:22 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
What about surface water as it becomes ground water?

Where is that interface/transition point?

56 posted on 08/01/2012 12:37:26 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
"Maybe we forgot that we’re not subject to the government; the government is subject to us."

Nay,

The tables have been turned.

We've been hornswoggled, given the ol' Okie-Dokie, bamboozled, hoodwinked.....

57 posted on 08/01/2012 12:47:14 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
When it comes to water rights you could all be thrown into a state of nature for 100 generations, and in the end the people then would come up with pretty much the same sort of agreements ~ the module of design in this case is hedged in by how much water there is, how much demand there is for it, and the level of technolgy available to make use of it.

Unless someone can revise the laws of chemistry those limitations are probably not going to change!

58 posted on 08/01/2012 3:52:08 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The local gov’t’s are the local Warlords, 0bama the King (Dicktater actually).


59 posted on 08/01/2012 4:49:36 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
So, we get rid of them and you become the local warlord/dictator.

Sounds like a plan eh!

60 posted on 08/01/2012 5:54:20 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson