I was so taken back by your attitude that I read most of the thread. It is not just me you are attacking. It was a mistake to respond back to you, but I’ll do it this last time just to let you know why:
Your posts to me reminded me of the posting style of the liberals I spar with on the internet every day. The ad-hominem and disagreement with almost no supporting evidence and the basic attitude of “what, are you stupid?” is something I have no time for.
Done. Good luck on your quest to get half the site that disagrees with you banned like they do on DU.
I was so taken back by your attitude
***You mean, the same attitude as JimRob who refuses to vote for a lying, baby-killing statist?
Your posts to me reminded me of the posting style of the liberals I spar with on the internet every day. The ad-hominem and disagreement with almost no supporting evidence and the basic attitude of “what, are you stupid?”
***Tell you what. You post the same arguments to JimRob and we’ll see how it goes. Otherwise, maybe you’re just a bootlicker, posting to those in authority differently than those who have none.
Good luck on your quest to get half the site that disagrees with you banned
***I have no real desire to get anyone banned. See below for my proposal to prevent such a thing.
However, you may be right that I’ve been engaging in some manner of “bullying” because apparently I’ve been put on some form of probation. My posts say this: “ Your comment has been submitted for review.” So, if I have overstepped a line that’s been drawn I would like to know where that line is, and apologize. It’s just too easy to cross an invisible line.
JimRob, can you please clear up where the line is that I’ve apparently crossed? Also, how about the proposal I copied you on before?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2905011/replies?c=403
To: wolfcreek
Nothing has changed about my principles, ethics, or my relationship with God but you sure couldn’t tell it from the way I’ve been treated here lately. Why?
***My guess is that JimRob doesn’t want to open another heart-wrenching bugzapper thread. So he allows the RINO squishes to bash conservatives.
If it were me, I’d post a boundary establishing thread that draws the line for both sides. If you have decided for yourself to vote for Romney, that’s your own choice that we disagree with. If you’ve decided to write in a conservative, that is also your own choice. Each Freeper makes their choice and the choice is respected
But if you try to separate conservatives from their conservative beliefs on this conservative website to get them to vote for a librul like Romney, you’re a librul and you’ve crossed the line. Similarly, if you call the Romney voters something like ‘squishes’ or ‘cowards’ or CINOs or ‘libruls’ then you have also crossed the line. Anyone who crosses the line gets one warning, then a timeout.
Seems like a simple way to keep the peace during such a troublesome time that the choice is 2 babykilling libtards.
368 posted on 07/11/2012 8:30:11 AM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It’s A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
________________________________________
To: Kevmo
If it were me, I’d post a boundary establishing thread that draws the line for both sides. If you have decided for yourself to vote for Romney, that’s your own choice that we disagree with. If you’ve decided to write in a conservative, that is also your own choice. Each Freeper makes their choice and the choice is respected.
I called directly to the top for this several months ago, as soon as it became clear that Romney was pulling away with the nomination.
I was told pointedly that there would be absolutely no room on FR for those who thought supporting the GOP nominee was best for America.
Then there was the so-called “truce” that was utterly ill-formed and incoherent and failed to address any of the real issues at hand.
Now here we are, doing what we’re doing.
Oh, well. At least we’re making the DUmmies, the commies, Team Obama, the rent-seekers, the moochers, and the jihadis happy.
403 posted on 07/11/2012 11:08:13 AM PDT by rogue yam
To: rogue yam; Jim Robinson
Well, this is interesting. We’ve got a RINO squish agreeing with a hold-your-ground Conservative agreeing with eachother on how this situation should be handled on Free Republic.
540 posted on 07/11/2012 5:03:37 PM PDT by Kevmo ( FRINAGOPWIASS: Free Republic Is Not A GOP Website. It’s A Socon Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
http://www.freerepublic.com/~rogueyam/
This account has been banned or suspended.