Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robowombat
From the article:

The CIA carried out an unprecedented 132 drone attacks in tribal areas, claiming the lives of 938 people, it said. The Conflict Monitoring Center points out that none of the media organizations throughout last year reported on body counts from independent sources. Many analysts believe the geo-strategic game plan of the US has turned out to be counterproductive. The year 2010 was one of the deadliest years for civilians living in the tribal regions, as the number of drone strikes exceeded the combined number of such attacks carried out from 2004 to 2009. The report states that 2,052 people lost their lives in drone strikes during the 5-year period between 2004 and 2009. The rising civilian causalities have left behind many tragic stories in the tribal areas.

So we're just supposed to assume that these "people" were civilians? The imprecision of the language used here is interesting.

18 posted on 08/04/2012 4:01:38 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yardstick
You are correct. You have spotted a significant semantic trick by which the author conflates all drone strike fatalities as ‘people’ who it is inferred are ‘civilians’ and therefore Innocent noncombatants. I don't agree with everything I post. I post what seems to be interesting and provocative news or opinion appearing as news (such as this item) for Freepers to enjoy.
24 posted on 08/04/2012 8:14:54 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson