Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: scottjewell

They couldn’t “stop at civil unions”. The left wouldn’t let them, because that wouldn’t have achieved the goal of UNdefining marriage and of criminalizing Christianity.

So, the homos were told “nothing less than full equal legal and societal recognition of gay ‘marriage’ will be allowed”.


58 posted on 08/04/2012 12:28:47 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

Yes, they are being used as a vehicle of the left. True...


64 posted on 08/04/2012 1:01:49 PM PDT by scottjewell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: MrB; scottjewell

It all began with DADT in the 1990’s, which seemed like a reasonable policy. But, with every step, the activists screamed for more and more.

If marriage is ever redefined nationwide, what will happen next? Will the activists stop there?

At some point, they will have to concede that, whatever name is given to a same-sex relationship, it can never be the same as marriage. So maybe their next step will be to have any disagreement with same-sex “marriage” labeled as a hate crime under the law.

And then what will they want next? Already there have been articles claiming same-sex couples somehow have superior relationships, and that the rest of us can learn from them. And, already, same-sex couples are given adoption privileges that single people and people in platonic relationships aren’t given. Will same-sex couples be screaming for adoption privileges over opposite-sex married couples next?

It all sounds crazy, but we live in strange times.


68 posted on 08/04/2012 2:13:02 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson