Allow with what BDZ has found and well reported without waiver. There is a very decernable and documentable pattern of corruption that is not hard to track.
Does anyone have the ‘Peterboy’ COLB. It was a COLB for Peter J Kema Jr., aka, Peterboy. His 1991 COLB used to be publicly available at the Hawaii DOH website. Why? He was deceased and the newspapers sued to gain access to all of his records held by Hawaii. This included his COLB pinted in 1991.
The COLB from 1991 is tell just in its format. It is similar in content to newer ones. But it included much, much more elaborate security and anti-copy features. The copy posted at HDOH had the word VOID all over it from the photocopy process - just as any standard photocopy document should have.
Two elements show long term and shorter term corruption by Hawaii.
First, the later COLB or LFBCs documents are all but void any security features. The 1991 Peterboy document has many more features to resist tampering than a current document.
Second, HDOH removed access to Peterboy’s COLB from their website in 2009 or 2010. Even though it had been there FOR YEARS without issue. It is a public document. But it showed that Hawaii explicitly and deliberately weakened the anti-tampering features of their official documents. So easy access to the document from their own website was removed.
Hawaii is home to severe corruption. It was going on well before 2008. But it has become much more bolder over the last 4 years.
Another interesting thing about the Peterboy COLB: the Onaka signature on the Ah Nee BC that WND posted (the one whose BC# has to be fabricated, if Verna Lee accurately described how they numbered the BC’s - and which I initially believed was forged because two of the digits appear to overlap) looks very much like it is somebody trying very carefully to imitate the Onaka signature from the Peterboy COLB, which is one of the Onaka signatures nearest to the time claimed as the release date on the Ah Nee BC.
The Kema COLB has been posted somewhere on FR. I’ve got a copy of it saved as well. It does seem ridiculous that the number of security features on HI BC’s would have gone DOWN since 9-11 of 2001, when we became acutely aware of the risk that identity fraud poses.
Another reason they probably wanted to hide that the document had been made available is that they are trying to claim that vital records can NEVER be disclosed - when in reality ALL the rules on disclosure say that the privacy interest has to be balanced against the public interest and holding government accountable.
Do have any details of this suit? A link maybe?