Posted on 08/04/2012 10:34:51 AM PDT by Kaslin
Democrat rents farmland to telecom, sponsors legislation favorable to that telecom
An Iowa Democratic House member has raked in more than $50,000 since 2002 for hosting a cell phone tower on his property, while sponsoring a number of bills designed to boost rural telecommunications.
Rep. Leonard Boswell (D., Iowa) rents out a small portion of his farmland to Chat Mobility, a telecommunications company that provides cellular coverage to rural communities in southwest Iowa. Since 2002, he has made about $5,000 per year renting out the space for a cell phone tower operated by Chat Mobility, formerly known as Lyrix Wireless, according to his financial disclosure filings.
He signed the contract with the company shortly after he cosponsored the Rural Telecommunications Enhancement Act of 2001, which would have allowed the Department of Agriculture to make loan guarantees and provide subsidies to telecommunication firms that enhance cellular service in rural environments.
That bill died in committee, but Boswell has been a reliable advocate for helping telecommunications companies looking to expand to rural areas. In 2009, he voted in favor of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which allocated more than $7 billion to rural telecommunications, Internet, and cellular expansion.
Boswell did not return calls or emails requesting comment.
Boswell has ramped up his efforts on behalf of rural telecommunications in recent years, as his contract with Chat Mobility, which he continues to itemize as Lyrix on his disclosure forms, grows in size. In 2010 and 2012, the rental agreement earned Boswell between $5,000 and $15,000, a steep increase from the $2,500 to $5,000 he earned between 2003 and 2009.
Chat Mobility officials did not respond to calls or emails for comment.
In 2009 and 2011, Boswell cosponsored three pieces of legislation that would have helped subsidize or give tax breaks to companies with telecommunications operations and ventures in rural areas.
In 2011, he co-sponsored the Wireless Tax Fairness Act, which prevents local and state governments from creating taxes that target wireless technology. The national average for those taxes is more than 16.3 percent. The Act reached the Senate floor in July.
Boswell has had less success in other efforts to cut breaks for telecom companies. A 2009 tax break aimed at the Telephone Excise tax died in committee. In 2011, his attempt to create a National Infrastructure Development Bank, which would create a government-run lending service that would help finance, among other infrastructure services, cellular and broadband expansion into rural areas, stalled in committee.
If there was any honesty to our reps there would be a ton of arrests and fines for bribing federal officials, and furthermore the officials that accepted bribes would be called out publicly by the other officials for having accepted them.
As it stands - when’s the last time you saw any of either?
This reporter needs to check back a decade or two. Boswell started as the Iowa Speaker of the House I think it was. He’s got all the connections around the state in his pocket.
I really, REALLY do not see a problem with a Congressman getting approximately $5000 per year ($50.000/10years) for leasing out a small section of his farm to a telecommunications firm.
This is nothing compared to the millions Republicans got working with K Street: Tom Delay, Michael Scanlon (who made $66Million in 3-years), and others.
See: The K Street Gang: The Rise and Fall of the Republican Machine, by Continetti
Boswell is slime, but the money he’s getting on the take isn’t from a cell phone tower lease.
Prime locations get a $1000 per MONTH. The Boswell farm’s isolated location (not near any major metro area) and poor farmland make $5000/yr a handsome amount, but wouldn’t pay for anything a big-spender wanted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
