To: Dr. Sivana
"This is a thread about Tea Party influence in the Senate, and you have to bring it back to Romney.'Don't sweat it. There is a crazy cohort here who shoot down anyone who even acknowledges Romney (poor candidate that he is). They are about 10 true believers blowing smoke up each others behinds.
So much sturm and drang to no avail. Reminiscent of the Perot voters who gave us the cigar wetter. They will be of no consequence in November.
18 posted on
08/05/2012 6:49:26 PM PDT by
SnuffaBolshevik
(In a tornado, even turkeys can fly.)
To: SnuffaBolshevik
There is a crazy cohort here who shoot down anyone who even acknowledges Romney [ . . . ] So much sturm and drang to no avail.
I will not be voting for Romney.
I understand those who do.
FR is officially an anti-Romney site.
I would like conservatives to get along on those things on which we are united. I would expect the same courtesy from Romney supporters.
Using a thread about Senate races to bait those of us who do not support a man who would return the Republican Party to the Rockefellers, Elliot Richardsons, Lowell Weickers, Christin Todd-Whitmans is not a way to advance conservative unity.
If anti-Romney voters will be of no consequence, and I never said we would be of any consequence, why do Romney supporters have to pick fights instead of encouraging support of conservatives on the underticket?
20 posted on
08/05/2012 8:28:06 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("I love to hear you talk talk talk, but I hate what I hear you say."-Del Shannon)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson