Posted on 08/07/2012 6:36:10 AM PDT by xzins
With which waffle of Mitt's do you agree.
A significant percentage go after any kid they can get ahold of, regardless of the sex. There are women who abuse both little girls and little boys, as well as men who do the same.
Some perverts are fixated on control, or despoiling purity, or orgasms rather than the bodies of their victims.
What is true, however, is that an adult who is not sexually attracted to any but the opposite sex are generally safer around kids of their own gender.
I guess we will all just have to vote for Virgil to teach those nasty wepublicans a lesson.
Your crap is getting tiresome. Give it a rest.
Very good points: he covers both bases, like the moderate
he is. It is important at this point NOT to let issues like
this become top-heavy and get demagogued into allowing Team
Obama to gain the upper hand in the “Social Issues” realm.
You’ve got to pick your battles. I have no doubt Romney really believes what he is quoted as believing, and he’s managed to cover both bases “without even trying”.
He believes in the rule of law and in letting the voters decide.
Romney: "One-hundred-and-seventy-thousand citizens followed our Constitution's process to petition government. They followed the prescribed process to place an item of importance before the voters. They asked for democracy.
"But today, by effectively avoiding the constitutionally required vote on same-sex marriage, 109 legislators disgraced their oath of office. Each of them swore to follow the Constitution. The Constitution plainly states that when a qualified petition is placed before them, they 'shall' vote. By not voting, we have witnessed the triumph of arrogance over democracy. Whether or not you favor same-sex marriage, you should be very concerned that the rule of law and the sovereignty of the people have been trampled."
Editorial: Marriage fiat in Massachusetts The Washington Times Published November 11, 2006
http://www.voteonmarriage.org/editorials.shtml#hc060107
If I were able to pick an ideal candidate, neither of the two on offer would make my list.
However, out of the two VIABLE candidates, Obama, with his unabashed contempt for the rule of law, is clearly the greater threat to our nation. Romney believes in following the law; Obama rules by his own personal fiat tool - the executive order.
It is an incontrovertible statement. A female pedophile is not, after all, a male. A male who has sex with a male IS a homosexual ~ the condition is defined by the act.
But, they are your only choice if you don’t want to support someone who stands up for things you abhor, that are against nature itself, that are against Nature’s God.
Thanks for the ping!
He will tell you anything he thinks you will believe that he said ~ and walk away and do what he said he was going to do anyway.
The man is a pathological liar, and probably bi-sexual, based on what he has said and has said recently, and will probably be saying somewhere today.
Mitt Romney did not ask my permission to come out in support of homosexual boy scout leaders and members. He did that all on his own.
Nor did he ask my permission to say of the 1st amendment speech and religious freedom, Chick-fil-A case, that it was not part of his campaign.
I don't have to make this stuff up, smm, Mitt's the source of it all.
Why blame me? All I did was post it.
The Republican candidate is still anywhere from 2 million to 6 million voters short.
He raised taxes on the blind. Somebody called it a “fee” and he jumped on doing that like a bedbug on your leg.
What Romney said is he doesn't care of pedophiles serve as Boy Scout leaders.
According to who or what?
But I wouldn’t want him on the Troop Board ~ nor would I trust this dude on camping trips. He’d be the kind of parent we’d want to stay home and away from our Boy Scout troop.
I'll type it again.
Heart attack(D)
Cancer(R)
FMCDH(BITS)
I feel that all people should be able to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation.
So...Romney thinks it’s OK for my Grandmother to join the BSA?
The republicans will not displace Mitt. In fact, they must WANT to rebrand their party as a liberal-moderate party, home of the gay agenda, endless spending, and big government. They must WANT to get rid of those pesky conservatives.
Or they want to lose.
Nonetheless, there will be conservatives on the ballot in Michigan. You will have a choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.