[marstegreg]

“I support the right of the Boy Scouts of America to decide what it wants to do on that issue.

Seems to me he said FIRST that he supports their right to do as they please. That’s good enough to me. What really bothers me about this is the same thing that bothers me about libs. The thought police. Romney should be allowd to feel however he wants as long as he does not impose his beliefs on others. It’s called freedom.

[duffee]

Reminds me of the old story about the scorpion and the frog.

[houeto]

Romney should be allowd to feel however he wants as long as he does not impose his beliefs on others.

What do you think he would do if he were President of the BSA?

[JimRed]

Romney should be allowed to feel however he wants as long as he does not impose his beliefs on others. It’s called freedom.

Bingo! Well stated. I've often said that capable people with less than conservative personal beliefs should not be automatically discounted if they are willing to put "feelings" aside and abide by the will of the people.

[SZonian]

The problem for me here is that he has come out espousing a public position that is in agreement with the queer agenda.

He has personally and quite publically aligned himself on the opposite side of conservatives on this issue and could now be viewed as an “ally” in the fight to destroy the BSA with the admission of queers.

[donna]

If we don't have the moral authority and obligation to protect children from homosexuals, then what is life about?

You can't sit on the fence with this one.

Romney's position is evil. No one should vote for such a man.

[so_real]

What really bothers me about this is the same thing that bothers me about libs. The thought police. Romney should be allowd to feel however he wants as long as he does not impose his beliefs on others.

The problem is, Romney is running as a Republican, not a Democrat. The idea behind having distinct parties is having distinct platforms whereon we can be represented by individuals who share our ideals and values. Romney is a pro-homosexualization, pro-mandate, pro-abortion, pro-bailout, pro-amnesty, pro-guncontrol, pro-stimulus, pro-deathpanel candidate. He should be running against Obama in the Democrat's primary. He fails utterly to represent conservatives. It is misleading and insulting to have him on our ticket and it damages the Republican brand, making future elections that much more difficult to secure.

[Kazan]

Seems to me he said FIRST that he supports their right to do as they please.

Big deal. Barney Frank would even take that position.

Romney should be allowd to feel however he wants as long as he does not impose his beliefs on others. It’s called freedom.

And, I and thousands of others that are repulsed by the homosexual agenda simply will refuse to vote for him. Republicans can lose the White House until hell freezes over if it puts up a pro-homosexual candidate.