[stephenjohnbanker]

” Is there some reason why boy scouts need to express their sexuality anyway?”

No.
There is only one reason homos have fought so hard to be Boy Scout leaders....to molest the kids. Anyone who believes otherwise is dumber than a box of rocks....apparently, that includes Romney.

” “In fact, according to research published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, they are ten times more likely to molest children than heterosexual men,” he said. “Gov. Romney’s position, if adopted by the BSA, would put the sexual innocence of untold numbers of young boys at risk.””

[DoughtyOne]

Strange as it may seem, I have heard of a few cases where  umpires (of boys baseball) have been arrested for improper behavior with young boys.  You wouldn't think they would come into contact on that level with the kids.

It has been my take that father volunteers pretty much ran the day to day Boy Scout efforts.  Why would there be a need for guys that weren't parents to get involved?

The boy's parents get involved and then drop out as their kid grows out of that age group.  Then the parents of new scouts get involved.

Isn't that sort of a built in safety measure?  I know some dads do bad things too, but at least they have some vested interest in the program.

[NFHale]

Why doesn’t Romney just hand the election over to Obama right now?

Geez...what a PUTZ...

When my kid was in the Scouts, we (fathers and Scout masters) got together and spoke of this issue, as it was just starting to surface.

We all unanimously agreed that it was unacceptable to have our boys anywhere near queer scoutmasters, should the organization cave in and allow them into the program.

I have no problem discriminating against anyone or anything when it comes to the safety of my kids. None whatsoever.