Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pre-VP Pick Analysis by Hugh Hewitt
Tales From A Tribble ^ | August 8, 2012 | Big Mike

Posted on 08/11/2012 9:49:59 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler

If this analysis is anything like Hugh's constitutional knowledge, follow this analysis closely. That means Hugh is on to something. On the other hand, if this analysis is anything like Hugh's sports picks, stop reading this post immediately.

Hugh realizes that some of the polls out there are basically meaningless, as they are using only registered voters with a big overwhelming sample of Democrats. That just doesn't meet the reality of the political landscape today. So, those polls following that model cannot be anywhere close to accurate.

Hugh knows that Governor Romney has his own internal polls that clearly give the candidate a good reading on how his campaign is doing. So, Hugh is using his calculations based on Romney's internal polls.

Hugh says there are five possible situations that the internal polling of Romney will show. That Romney is way ahead, that he has a slight lead, that the race is essentially tied, that he is closely behind, or that Romney is way behind. Each situation, according to Hugh, will determine a different VP choice by Romney.

Hugh is predicting right now that:

1. If Romney has a big lead, he will choose Tim Pawlenty the former governor of Minnesota.

2. If Romney has a small lead he will choose Rob Portman, the US senator from Ohio.

3. If Romney's internal polls show the race is tied it will be Paul Ryan, congressman from Wisconsin.

4. If Mitt Romney is behind by a little, he will choose Marco Rubio, US Senator from Florida.

5. And if the polls are showing Romney is way behind and needs a "Hail Mary" pick, it will be Chris Christie, Governor from New Jersey.

(Excerpt) Read more at talesfromatribble.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hewittt; ryan; vice
I listened with interest to Hugh Hewitt's analysis of Mitt Romney's vice presidential pick last Tuesday-- BEFORE the fact--and what it would mean. According to Hugh's analysis, the internal polls indicate a tie at present.

Here is Hugh's analysis as recorded by a blogger.

1 posted on 08/11/2012 9:50:14 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

I listen to his show on the drive. Common sense guy and I like his approach to the political sideshow...he cuts though the BS. I think the latest round of negative ads is spewing desperation. I don’t think this is a tie race...I think the polls might show it that way, but there really is a “I don’t want to say I’m voting against the black guy” factor for fear of being thought racist. It will change in the booth, though. I think we’ll see the indies and centrists coming around.

Can’t wait to see Ryan/Biden debate. Heh heh heh...now THAT’S entertainment.


2 posted on 08/11/2012 10:01:27 AM PDT by jessduntno ("Clamo, clamatis, omnes clamamus pro glace lactis." - Universal truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
I think he is off on this analysis

Here's my opinion.

Ryan is at least tied for the LEAST safe choice. He is VERY controversial and is hated by the media. Romney only chooses Ryan if internal polls show him WAY ahead and he is not the least bit concerned about the media or independents or any of that manipulation crap put out by democrats.

Romney has a huge lead and chose to solidify the base by picking Ryan.

3 posted on 08/11/2012 10:02:12 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
I don't think Hugh has much of a record on picking winners and losers. Like Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina in CA 2010, Jane Norton in CO 2010. Numerous others that no one is interested in. Hewitt always is positively convinced that he knows all when it comes to forecasting political outcomes. He is convinced that the Mormon will BE in the White House come Jan 21, 2013, and that scares the he$$ out of me. He is wrong at least as many times as he is correct.
4 posted on 08/11/2012 10:03:44 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

Exactly!


5 posted on 08/11/2012 10:07:22 AM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I don’t think Hugh has much of a record on picking winners and losers.


Hugh Hewitt is a rah-rah kind of guy. He is just like the cheerleaders at a football game, who do not know what the heck is the score.

We could be down by 50 points, but there is Hugh out there jumping, smiling, doing the splits, shaking his little pink pom-poms anyway.


6 posted on 08/11/2012 10:26:23 AM PDT by AlexisHeavyMetal1981 (Eat Mor Chikin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

Hugh has a tin ear for Politics and Football. Having said that, I do enjoy his guests.


7 posted on 08/11/2012 12:17:15 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

Spot on!

His internals likely showed his huge lead may have slipped a little in recent days by squemish independents scared by the negative junk, but he didn’t go with someone to nail down Florida or Ohio or some minority vote - he took the bold step of focussing the issues - Economy, Budget and the role of the Federal Government. Clear choice. Solidified the base NATIONALLY - not just a region or group.


8 posted on 08/11/2012 12:32:29 PM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibertyOh; precisionshootist
His internals likely showed his huge lead may have slipped a little in recent days by squemish independents scared by the negative junk, but he didn’t go with someone to nail down Florida or Ohio or some minority vote - he took the bold step of focussing the issues - Economy, Budget and the role of the Federal Government. Clear choice. Solidified the base NATIONALLY - not just a region or group.

This is why the choice of Ryan was pure genius: this was a VP choice focusing on NATIONAL priorities and our future as a country.

9 posted on 08/11/2012 12:35:26 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson