Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt

I don’t know either.

As I understand it, it’s like having a container with a million ping-pong balls - 997,000 red and 3000 green (based on the relative proportions of U-238 and U-235).

Then, you start pulling balls out of the container. If you get a green ball, you put it back; if you get a red ball, you throw it away.

Initially, nearly every ball you pull will be thrown away. Eventually, though, a significant proportion will be green, and you put it back.

Clearly, as the number of red balls decreases, you’ll be disposing of them at a lower rate. Why would uranium atoms be any different?


14 posted on 08/13/2012 5:39:03 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: DuncanWaring

You assume the balls are the same size. I will bet that is where the difference lies. As the heavier atoms are flung to the outside, it is easier to collect them. Just a thought.


16 posted on 08/14/2012 1:30:57 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (I am NOT from Vermont. I am from MA. And I don't support Romney. Please read before "assuming.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson