Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Future of the Republic Hangs on 2012 Election
Townhall.com ^ | August 17, 2012 | Diana West

Posted on 08/17/2012 10:17:27 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Kaslin

Romney was next to last on my list, just ahead of Ron Paul, whom I believe would not defend the country. I profoundly disagree with most of Romney’s positions. If he wins, let’s hope that Paul Ryan will show him the way.

That having been said, there are some who refuse to recognize that our Republic is truly in danger if Obama wins and is allowed four more years to create law out of thin air without approval of Congress or approval of the courts. We have only seen the tip of the iceberg of what he is capable of doing. He has told us and shown us his disdain for the Constitution.

To those who hate Romney because of his religion, this Catholic does not. That would change, of course, if Mormon parents start strapping bombs to their kids, killing innocent people, and warning us to convert or die.


21 posted on 08/17/2012 12:57:38 PM PDT by doug from upland (Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The future of the Republic was decided when the franchise was expanded via constitutional amendments in the early 20th century.
Apparently the author of this nonsense hasn’t yet gotten a clue that the electorate is demented.
There is no future. This Republic will collapse as surely as the sun rises in the morning.
The right to vote must be restricted, the Founders knew this to be true.


22 posted on 08/17/2012 1:07:26 PM PDT by Rome2000 (WILLARD ROMNEY -- MORMON MELCHIDEZEK BISHOP -HIS FAMILY HAS AVOIDED MILITARY SERVICE FOR GENERATIONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
wouldn’t you think someone in the media would want to check this stuff out?
Oh, I forgot...there is no longer a fair and independent media.
There hasn’t been independent journalism since the Associated Press homogenized it in the second half of the Nineteenth Century.
And there never has been a single “fair” journalism, except to the extent that in the antebellum era there was actually a choice of journalisms, rather than a single one as we have always known it.

23 posted on 08/17/2012 3:05:18 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yep, there are no sidelines in this election.

Breitbart CPAC speech..

24 posted on 08/17/2012 3:24:51 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yep, there are no sidelines in this election.

Breitbart CPAC speech..


25 posted on 08/17/2012 3:25:29 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson