You’ve been a FReeper as long as I have, and you have not been aware of the leanings of Reuters. C’mon....you can’t do better than that! Please!
“You’ve been a FReeper as long as I have, and you have not been aware of the leanings of Reuters. C’mon....you can’t do better than that! Please!”
I was telling you the truth that I was unaware of Reuters being “leftest.” I do not read every news source to determine what I can or cannot trust. I did not buy any of the stuff on their about Ryan having a bad plan. The only thing that caught my eye and caused me to post it was that there appears to be a situation where Ryan “may” be compromising long held signature views, in order to be VP.
Since it is a contention here that Romney is made OK by Ryan keeping him in check. IF such a situation is true, then the “keeping in check” view is flawed. Since Reuters is such a unreliable source, it will take more time to see if this is is truly occuring.
I believe, just like Jim Robinson, that Ryan will be tossed to the side by Romney once Ryan helps Romney get elected. I also agree with Jim Robinson, that Romney should not be supported by someone who is truly conservative. He past record is deplorable, and he didn’t “see the light” on issues of significant until he decided first to run for POTUS in 2007. He is not to be trusted with high office anymore than Obama. Having Ryan as his VP does not change that. It makes him more insidious.