Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 6 Most Popular Stocks Owned By Congress
Townhall.com ^ | August 18, 2012 | Paul Tracy

Posted on 08/18/2012 3:39:34 AM PDT by Kaslin

The truth will make you sick.

Congress is rich -- unbelievably rich. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, 249 of the 535 congressmen are millionaires. That's 47%. By comparison, about 5% of U.S. households are worth more than $1 million.

And until recently, insider trading laws didn't apply to congress. They could buy or sell investments based on non-public information they learned from their privileged positions.

As you would expect, that's led to some great returns for Congress' investments. In a study cited by Barron's, members of the U.S. House of Representatives beat investors like you and me by 55 basis points a month. That comes out to an extra 6.8% per year.

I don't know which is worse: the fact that insider trading was legal for some of our nation's wealthiest politicians... or that Congress refused to do anything about it for decades.

I even wrote about this problem back in July 2011, after doing research into how congressmen invest.

Then, in late 2011, 60 Minutes -- one of the most-respected investigative journalism programs on TV -- dedicated a segment to the issue. Here's a portion of what they had to say...

"In mid September 2008, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average still above 10,000, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke were holding closed-door briefings with congressional leaders, and privately warning them that a global financial meltdown could occur within a few days. One of those attending was Alabama Representative Spencer Bachus, then the ranking Republican member on the House Financial Services Committee and now its chairman."

"While Congressman Bachus was publicly trying to keep the economy from cratering, he was privately betting that it would, buying option funds that would go up in value if the market went down. He would make a variety of trades and profited at a time when most Americans were losing their shirts."

And that was just one example of what was happening on both sides of the aisle.

The report from 60 Minutes led to a frenzy. And a few months after the story aired, the Stop Trading On Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act, which curbed insider trading by Congress, was signed into law.

Of course, for many years, the rules required all members of Congress (along with some of their higher-paid aides) to publicly disclose information on their finances each year -- including stock holdings.

Thankfully, the STOCK Act strengthened this requirement. Not only did it eliminate insider trading, but Congress must now disclose their trades within 45 days after they happen.

That means we have an opportunity to see exactly what our "representatives" are buying.

But what may surprise you is that the most popular stocks owned by Congress aren't exclusive investments only being bought by the elite.

Take a look...

The table above shows the most widely held stocks owned by Congress in 2010 (2011 data hasn't been published yet). Keep in mind this was before Congress passed the STOCK Act...

As you can see, each stock on the list is a major corporation. So how is it that Congress can earn higher returns owning some of the most well-known companies on the planet?

As I've shown you, it's very likely Congress has helped themselves for years by trading on non-public information. But I think there is likely another reason why Congress is outperforming regular investors...

You see, some of the best returns for politicians, based on their own financial disclosures, come from owning well-known, profitable businesses for the long haul.

Take Representative Lloyd Doggett (D-TX), for example. According to financial disclosure statements, he's owned a stake in Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) since May 2000. And he still owned a stake as of his most recent disclosure filed in 2011. In that time, the United States experienced two recessions, two wars, and high unemployment. Yet, Procter & Gamble's total return during that period was over 140%. For comparison, the S&P 500 gained less than 10% during that time.

And it's a similar story for Representative Jon Kyl (R-AZ), who bought shares of Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) in May 2001. He still holds a stake in the company today. Over that span, Wells Fargo has returned about 75% -- despite the problems in the banking sector. That's more than triple the S&P's return of roughly 20%.

There is no definitive answer as to how long the average congressman holds a stock. But in my research, holding for the long-term seems to be the rule for Congress, not the exception.

And the simple fact is, the longer you hold an investment, the more likely you are to make money.

A recent study by investment firm Oppenheimer showed that the S&P 500 has never suffered a loss in a 20-year period (measured in rolling monthly periods). Their study went all the way back to 1950.

And each of the six stocks listed above has a positive 20-year return. Cisco returned more than 2,500% during that period. And General Electric -- despite being more than 100 years old -- has still delivered a 480% return during the past two decades.

Action to Take --> That's not to say every stock will automatically go up because you hold for a long time. But owning great businesses -- and letting their returns grow year after year -- looks to be the best way to make money in the market... even if you're a member of Congress.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: congressstocks; insidertrading; stockmarket

1 posted on 08/18/2012 3:39:40 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Congress is rich -- unbelievably rich. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, 249 of the 535 congressmen are millionaires. That's 47%. By comparison, about 5% of U.S. households are worth more than $1 million.

Am I supposed to be outraged or something? Because I'm not.

On the other hand, I'd be scared to death if the income of Congress matched the general population.

2 posted on 08/18/2012 3:52:21 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Like all Moslems, the US Congress and their staff,
are IMMUNE to ObamaCARE and DeathCARE.

How special is THAT?


3 posted on 08/18/2012 3:54:59 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session."- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Yeah


4 posted on 08/18/2012 4:01:32 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
So now we find out who the “RICH” are. Of coarse they made thier money at our expense not because of hard work and entreprenuerialism. Those evil CEO's just have to add criminal to thier resume
5 posted on 08/18/2012 4:05:00 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (bb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Strategerist; ronnie raygun

I bought a whole lot of shares of CSCO back in 1995.

Sold it in March 2000 at the height of the dot com bubble.

Made a ton of money.


6 posted on 08/18/2012 4:28:25 AM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Knight Capital (KCG) is an interesting case. Notice the report on the significant stakes held in that company even with the stock collapse. Wonder what they know?

Click here.

7 posted on 08/18/2012 4:45:16 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

For study later


8 posted on 08/18/2012 5:00:06 AM PDT by w4women (A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w4women

When the American people bought GM, the entire congress should have been forced to divest in every investment and put all their investments in GM.


9 posted on 08/18/2012 5:07:46 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (ABO 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Congress should not be exempt from any laws
they pass, all US citizens should comply. Amen
10 posted on 08/18/2012 5:16:13 AM PDT by gakrak (“If you put the Fed Gov in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
They are doing the country's work don't chaknow, and it's hard to be the congress critter, screwing the publik, at least they should get a break. sarc
11 posted on 08/18/2012 5:16:30 AM PDT by boomop1 (term limits will only save this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The stocks shown are the best companies on earth. It is not unreasonable for them to be popular with congressmen

Everybody should own them

To do so is to place confidence in America.


12 posted on 08/18/2012 5:20:41 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Also they own a boat load full of GM. Actually, we all do.


13 posted on 08/18/2012 5:23:23 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gakrak

I’d go further and require them to be subject to Social Security with no special Congressional pension, and Obamacare with no additional coverage allowed other than what they’re able to acquire out of pocket.

Nothing like having skin in the game to make somebody care about the consequences of their actions.


14 posted on 08/18/2012 5:29:31 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

These are some of the most widely owned U.S. stocks. Nearly anyone with a 401(k) plan, who has money in US stock funds (by choice or default) owns these stocks through their mutual funds.


15 posted on 08/18/2012 5:38:39 AM PDT by GuySwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

These people do not deserve the trust placed on them. They deserve 6 x 9 cell.

Exactly who is exempt from what not just our government that is illegal?


16 posted on 08/18/2012 5:39:31 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not only do we need to make this completely illegal, We need to make sure the people upon leaving office no matter how they leave can not use the info they obtained ever again nor can they pass it on.


17 posted on 08/18/2012 5:48:31 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hear the DNC is pulling it’s money out of BOA wonder what they know??.


18 posted on 08/18/2012 5:53:16 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

So does that mean Harry Reid got his millions by holding Bank of America stock since 1922 ( which is when it was formed and called Bank of America and Italy ).


19 posted on 08/18/2012 6:18:45 AM PDT by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Insider trading is virtually impossible to stop. As treasurer of a fairly large publicly traded corporation I knew the monthly financial results weeks before even the CEO knew ... more so the general public. Every company has a person like me.
20 posted on 08/18/2012 6:25:03 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Those sure are some bold picks.

/S

21 posted on 08/18/2012 6:50:12 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I beg to differ with this article, at least about General Electric. I’ve a small amount for over 10 years and actually KNOW how it’s doing and it’s a not a good stock, in fact I’m going to dump it shortly.


22 posted on 08/18/2012 7:23:17 AM PDT by Auntie Mame (Fear not tomorrow. God is already there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If their incomes matched their IQs, they’d all be in the poorhouse.


23 posted on 08/18/2012 10:12:29 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

” hear the DNC is pulling it’s money out of BOA wonder what they know??”

Knowing the DNC as we do, they probably got a tip to invest their deposits with Bank of China,Juarez Savings and Loan or maybe they plan on keeping it in Chicago.

http://cnsnews.com/blog/michelle-malkin/your-guide-sleazy-democratic-party-backed-banks


24 posted on 08/18/2012 4:33:20 PM PDT by widdle_wabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

” hear the DNC is pulling it’s money out of BOA wonder what they know??”

Knowing the DNC as we do, they probably got a tip to invest their deposits with Bank of China, Juarez Savings and Loan or maybe they plan on keeping it in Chicago.

http://cnsnews.com/blog/michelle-malkin/your-guide-sleazy-democratic-party-backed-banks


25 posted on 08/18/2012 4:33:49 PM PDT by widdle_wabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: widdle_wabbit

Michelle is right they act just like the Mafia.


26 posted on 08/19/2012 6:10:30 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson