Posted on 08/18/2012 6:48:45 PM PDT by tsowellfan
Done. But I'm sure she was perfectly prepared for the unadulterated filth that would be thrown her way.
This idea that Sandusky was straight, and a pedophile, as opposed to “gay” is not just a passing comment:
It is deeply rooted in their ideology, and the crux of many of their arguments.
I saw comments on a gay site about the BSA ban on gays , and the whole rainbow agenda crowd was stressing that “we don’t need to watch for gays in the BSA, it’s pedophiles that need weeding out - they are a whole different camp.” This is said without any irony whatever, and one of the reasons they believe FRC should retain its “hate group” designation is because FRC believes there is a link between pedophilia and homosexuality - hence, they are practicing “hate speech”.
Liberals only care about child molestation when it is a white, middle class man from the south doing it. If it is a bunch of homo’s groping and raping a child, they think that is good parenting.
“She tried to say that God was mad because the people in the city were rude to the visiting angels. I told her that that was incorrect.”
That is one stupid professor. The angles handled the “rudeness” of the homos by striking them blindness. Funny she would call attempted rape of another man “rudeness”.
I meant to say angels not angles. Sorry I am no good without my coffee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.