Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marron

The difference is one of who holds the mineral rights. If it’s Federal Land, not much is going to happen under this regime.


28 posted on 08/20/2012 8:35:58 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

The Colorado shale deposits are largely on federal land I believe, (although some are under private land). That made it easy to shut that down.

I remember reading here (FR) a few years back that there was a project in Utah on private land that was also shut down by the feds. They just really don’t like shale oil.


30 posted on 08/20/2012 8:47:46 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson