Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: backwoods-engineer

“So Romney-Ryan are liberal on abortion. That isn’t going to be decided this presidential term, people!”

Wait, I thought we all needed to get behind Romney because we couldn’t afford to let Obama appoint any more Supreme Court justices. So, the converse of that is we should want Romney to appoint the justices instead. Therefore, Romney’s views on abortion are very relevant, because that issue very well could be decided in this presidential term, via the Supreme Court picks.


51 posted on 08/20/2012 6:22:18 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman; P-Marlowe
we should want Romney to appoint the justices instead.

And since Romney supports rape/incest abortion, then abortion has to be kept legal to permit that, therefore, justices chosen must be supporters of legal abortion...at least in cases of rape/incest (however broadly they are defined.)

I agree with your worry on this one, Bman.

62 posted on 08/20/2012 6:34:25 AM PDT by xzins (Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson